IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 20 October 2012 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272A921F8585 for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 04:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXuLZeisEDJB for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 04:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F521F8562 for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9KBRift022265; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:27:44 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9KBRhob022251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:27:44 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>, "'MIB Doctors (E-mail)'" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, 'Thomas Nadeau' <tnadeau@juniper.net>
References: <5081C15E.7010209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5081C15E.7010209@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:27:46 +0100
Message-ID: <0b3201cdaeb5$ee7067b0$cb513710$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQF5c2vQs4+2mcZcPqyoGwtYM9MrL5hqgyXg
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:27:51 -0000

Hello,

The Ballot write-up says
  Implementation status is unknown (as is often the case).
  The document has been through many review cycles,
  including review by a MIB Doctor and by the AD. Details
  are on the WG list.

Similar text shows in the shepherd write-up.

Looking at the CCAMP mail archive, it looks like Joan did the review.

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
> Sent: 19 October 2012 22:09
> To: MIB Doctors (E-mail); Thomas Nadeau
> Cc: Adrian Farrel
> Subject: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Did one MIB doctor review this MIB module? Except Tom obviously ;-)
> Tom, based on your MIB doctor experience, any controversial points in
> the MIB module?
> 
> Regards, Benoit.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email