Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] MPLS-RT review of draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-04
Kishore Tiruveedhula <kishoret@juniper.net> Tue, 13 October 2015 02:17 UTC
Return-Path: <kishoret@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E641B2F22 for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7XDwqR9g81L for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299071B2F1F for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.120.19) by BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.120.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.293.16; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:17:27 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.120.19]) by BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.120.19]) with mapi id 15.01.0293.007; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:17:27 +0000
From: Kishore Tiruveedhula <kishoret@juniper.net>
To: Joan Cucchiara <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>, 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, "aldrin.ietf@gmail.com" <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Young Lee' <youngleetx@yahoo.com>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: MPLS-RT review of draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-04
Thread-Index: AQHQi/KjXiTl0kx2cESz/95cy9cM452GpGmA///JvQCA4vH+gA==
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:17:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D241E135.3B8B0%kishoret@juniper.net>
References: <5550B598.40701@pi.nu> <01d301d093de$28a2b900$79e82b00$@mindspring.com> <D18381E6.2A67A%kishoret@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D18381E6.2A67A%kishoret@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kishoret@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB1716; 5:UhmXDEHFD7oxLXT8+bYG9WGt/wRRIkpEy1dTJModeVNRjwfEL0gFzG0wYioDjxOmrCto92aY/csmCd+1IijxS3qHXhGM+FOsRX1JWMAZdOFrEAoh3UI5UOsJH8mXxwSPlb520117cG9WFYoq/TD49g==; 24:74syd5ZrIKm+ghDjJZ+JzHv1tgIE5+ZgI1ThaRJtKqBLEmpixtHIZB8X3YJT9t9wcqHiE6/v8NWy6t0PN1mWebTwbt+/rQ2e4uo8FhJWwlY=; 20:BBlXYTbptiumhtwGR30+LPQrr1ZaN86tR93d6dwYZXxFCYUTK+8yuYsQTXx0jMhPFvBrmEfVzy3nzuiEjnG1kw==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB17162EDB6FF19D18FBF3DD6AC1300@BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716;
x-forefront-prvs: 07283408BE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(43544003)(377454003)(164054003)(13464003)(377424004)(199003)(479174004)(189002)(24454002)(252514010)(81156007)(83506001)(105586002)(106116001)(102836002)(230783001)(50986999)(87936001)(189998001)(107886002)(19580395003)(5002640100001)(2521001)(64706001)(66066001)(106356001)(5008740100001)(122556002)(15975445007)(99286002)(2900100001)(86362001)(2950100001)(5001960100002)(40100003)(77096005)(76176999)(5001770100001)(97736004)(19580405001)(4001350100001)(5001920100001)(4001150100001)(54356999)(46102003)(5007970100001)(10400500002)(36756003)(11100500001)(2501003)(101416001)(5004730100002)(15974865002)(92566002)(7059030)(4001430100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716; H:BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <6E09074055BDB4419F9358C2238035E8@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2015 02:17:26.7419 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB1716
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mib-doctors/8X4shC4Jhs6RZdpTtDL81OB-gLs>
Cc: "draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib@tools.ietf.org" <draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib@tools.ietf.org>, "mib-doctors@ietf.org" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>, 'Mach Chen' <mach.chen@huawei.com>, Kishore Tiruveedhula <kishoret@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] MPLS-RT review of draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-04
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mib-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:17:34 -0000
Hi Loa, Joan I updated the draft for the below comments from "Joan Cucchiara² and posted the new version draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-05. Please let me know what would be the next steps for making the working group adoption ? ------------------- Name: draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib Revision: 05 Title: Definitions of Managed Objects for the LDP Point-to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched Paths Document date: 2015-10-12 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 37 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-05.tx t Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-05 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-05 ---------------------- Thanks, Kishore On 5/21/15, 12:38 PM, "Kishore Tiruveedhula" <kishoret@juniper.net> wrote: >Thanks Joan for reviewing this. I will update the doc for the comments. > >Thanks, >Kishore > >On 5/21/15, 11:52 AM, "Joan Cucchiara" <jcucchiara@mindspring.com> wrote: > >>Hello, (also cc'ing MIB Doctors) >> >>To the question of is this MIB Module ready for WG adoption, >>unfortunately, I would say "no" due to some very outdated practices that >>the authors are using which make the MIB Module NOT technically sound. >>The following two issues are very well-documented in the MIB Review >>guidelines (RFC418). These should be extremely easy fixes, but I would >>implore that the authors take care NOT to repeat these outdated >>practices in future draft versions. >> >>1) The sub-id MUST be requested from IANA when the document becomes an >>RFC. Please do NOT assign a sub-id yourselves. >>Please refer to RFC4181. >> >> ::= { mplsStdMIB 99 } >> >>2) LAST-UPDATED and (latest) REVISION clause dates do not agree. They >>should always agree. Again, please refer to RFC4181. >> >>Also, since the above needs to be updated, would also ask that the >>authors use the word "Notifications" instead of "Traps" in Section 4. >>and also put the "END" clause on the MIB Module. >> >>General Comments: >>------------------------------ >> >>The approach of extending/Augmenting with existing MIB Modules, RFC3815 >>and RFC3813 is a good way to approach this MIB Module in my opinion. >>Also, glad to see that the REFERENCE Clauses are used as this helps out >>tremendously with reviewing and implementing. >> >>Potential Unknown: >> >>Would caution that NOT all of the tables seem to contain valid indices, >>as such, I do not completely understand all of the relationships between >>tables in this MIB and the other MIB Modules. This may not be an issue >>at all, but just something to be aware of for future MIB reviews. >>Having said that, it does seem that the authors are heading in a good >>direction by making use of existing MIB Modules with extending/augmenting >>tables in this draft. At this point, I do not have a specific concern >>and think that this will be developed during the WG group process. >> >>Review Considerations for Reviewers, specifically: >>========================================= >>"whether the document is coherent, is it useful >>(ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is >>the >>document technically sound? We are interested in knowing whether the >>document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn't have >>to >>be perfect at this point, but should be a good start)." >> >>Document is coherent in that the objects defined are useful and support >>new features of LDP. Also, the overall organization seems like a good >>approach. I think a good deal of thought went into the proposed MIB >>Module with regard to leveraging from existing MIB Modules. >> >>I do think that it would be useful in an operational network as this MIB >>Module extends/augments existing MIB Modules which are widely deployed. >> >>Thanks, >> -Joan >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] >>> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:59 AM >>> To: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com; Young Lee; Joan Cucchiara >>> Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Mach Chen; >>>draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp- >>> mib@tools.ietf.org >>> Subject: MPLS-RT review of draft-tiruveedhula-mpls-mldp-mib-04 >>> >>> Sam, Young and Joan, >>> >>> >>> You have be selected as MPLS-RT reviewers for draft-tiruveedhula- mpls- >>> mldp-mib. >>> >>> Note to authors: You have been CC'd on this email so that you can know >>>that >>> this review is going on. However, please do not review your own >>>document. >>> >>> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it >>>useful >>> (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and >>>is the >>> document technically sound? We are interested in knowing whether the >>> document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn't have >>>to >>> be perfect at this point, but should be a good start). >>> >>> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and WG >>> secretary, and CC'd to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments >>>may >>> be sent privately to only the WG chairs. >>> >>> Mach Chen is the document shepherd for this draft, the reviews should >>>be >>> sent to him also. >>> >>> If you have technical comments you should try to be explicit about what >>> *really* need to be resolved before adopting it as a working group >>> document, and what can wait until the document is a working group >>> document and the working group has the revision control. >>> >>> Are you able to review this draft by May 26, 2015? Please respond in a >>>timely >>> fashion. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Loa >>> (as MPLS WG chair) >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >>> Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >>> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4311/9748 - Release Date: >>>05/11/15 >> >
- Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] MPLS-RT review of draft-tiruvee… Joan Cucchiara
- Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] MPLS-RT review of draft-tiruvee… Kishore Tiruveedhula
- Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] MPLS-RT review of draft-tiruvee… Kishore Tiruveedhula