Re: [middisc] middisc specification update

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 07 March 2012 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B7321E80B5 for <middisc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-ayb4caEfOg for <middisc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715C021E80AF for <middisc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.73,545,1325491200"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="631349046"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0800
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.239]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q2783ier001420; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.6.92]) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [middisc] middisc specification update
Thread-Index: AcyG5wLVJKtf0Y74SiSodjFq7qJ2lxObcJ+QAAJE5sAI3dxCQACKW9EQAABRXxAAVSWDgAAHzeFAAAIEGQA=
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:03:42 +0000
Message-ID: <71231A86-7A22-48C0-987F-5C01C25E7B33@netapp.com>
References: <4E9241F7.5090406@mti-systems.com><2AE215BDC76842F885AC7E9D34BD2CA4@davidPC><0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC580E546254@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com> <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC580EA21847@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB5ACE4EFBB5@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC580EA21B2D@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com> <56A8F14C-C1E1-4793-BC82-F27E89A9F8D4@bluecoat.com> <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC580EA222B2@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC580EA222B2@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F262C512-7B30-4EB1-950C-41A1F9135499"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Frederick, Ron" <ron.frederick@bluecoat.com>, "<middisc@ietf.org>" <middisc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [middisc] middisc specification update
X-BeenThere: middisc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions on TCP option for middlebox discovery." <middisc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/middisc>, <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/middisc>
List-Post: <mailto:middisc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/middisc>, <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:03:45 -0000

On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:55, Anantha Ramaiah (ananth) wrote:
> Fair enough.  We can note that some vendor codes are going to be
> reserved (FF to F0). These can be used to extend as needed tomorrow.
> Would that address your concern?

Idle thought: What makes us think that vendors will go through IANA to get one of these codepoints, when they have been squatting on option numbers already?

Lars