Re: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 19 December 2011 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97A521F8801 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:24:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.402, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6yIXKhmRv4im for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com (exprod7og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31DA21F853E for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob111.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTu9lTRh0PGueLTD01FhYqxFknFJZKpWR@postini.com; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:24:57 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80991B8297 for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C55E4190052; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:24:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.134]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:24:43 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Thread-Topic: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document
Thread-Index: AQHMuyJrBXZGqHrIRk6m9t2t9A95k5XfLl6AgABKEACABFZmAIAACzCAgAABiwCAAAmzgA==
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:24:43 +0000
Message-ID: <0FECAD9E-E1EB-4849-BF8E-227F49975559@nominum.com>
References: <COL118-W224376376AE7A3CC854753B1A30@phx.gbl> <4EEB70DF.3070201@viagenie.ca> <79DAA562-B463-4D11-A4E5-AEE1325531A0@nominum.com> <4EEF5278.8040103@viagenie.ca> <50824C2C-A4A8-4E92-A12D-45082B9CF5DC@nominum.com> <4EEF5D26.3080203@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4EEF5D26.3080203@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0FECAD9EE1EB4849BF8E227F49975559nominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<mif@ietf.org>" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:24:58 -0000

On Dec 19, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Simon Perreault wrote:
I just don't want the WG to see this document as something that allows us to place a "DONE" checkmark next to the API milestone. There is still API work to be done.

Well, an easy fix for this is to add a milestone that addresses this concern.