IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document

<pierrick.seite@orange.com> Fri, 16 December 2011 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <pierrick.seite@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A694221F899D for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:01:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZ96zEFCUoWc for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D77121F8511 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 193514110B0; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:02:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC1041104C; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:02:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:01:11 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CCBBD1.417ECD83"
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:01:10 +0100
Message-ID: <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C4620216981F@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <COL118-W224376376AE7A3CC854753B1A30@phx.gbl>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document
Thread-Index: Acy7ImyoRLQe7m9oS/68npzg+vaLxQArbgqQ
References: <COL118-W224376376AE7A3CC854753B1A30@phx.gbl>
From: pierrick.seite@orange.com
To: denghui02@hotmail.com, mif@ietf.org, margaretw42@gmail.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2011 09:01:11.0529 (UTC) FILETIME=[41E99D90:01CCBBD1]
Subject: Re: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:01:14 -0000

Hi,

 

I support the adoption of this I-D. IMHO, the proposed API model would allow to align our effort with the OMA-DM API. However, the liaison is to be clarified. 

 

Pierrick

 

De : mif-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mif-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Hui Deng
Envoyé : jeudi 15 décembre 2011 13:10
À : mif@ietf.org; Margaret
Objet : [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document

 

Hello all
 
Based on last time IETF 82th MIF meeting, we are calling for the adoption of API document as the working group document in the mailing list.
Just want to conform if anybody have different opinion on this.
 
thanks
 
-Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email