IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] 答复: RE: a question about rfc6418

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 21 December 2011 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFFB11E80A3 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.273
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9UUUbHCDNWmR for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB75E11E80B5 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eaak10 with SMTP id k10so795709eaa.31 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=H6yT/hlb8/5YtAvNHKp99RFFSez95t2zhDRFLEdKZHY=; b=W+dlireMY8Qj+7xnpxWeaDWnTw4qp0GElgyfzZT4sa/FfbajqUxkGIMd2O4t8Ucbiq fzccH2JTsxdzFn9D6z0vgKGouviN5E2Ztjw3oiKnla5nKwnmRmuwpQtqoGNyc5duPlur jSHd0UPWWWyCL4S4WWkSVIMTcpxPUYcTL+wF0=
Received: by 10.205.136.193 with SMTP id il1mr73063bkc.77.1324497080165; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.1.1.4] ([121.98.251.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm13190472bky.11.2011.12.21.11.51.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EF238AD.3070209@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:51:09 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn
References: <OF131F096E.E92B2955-ON4825796D.00358406-4825796D.0035A174@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OF131F096E.E92B2955-ON4825796D.00358406-4825796D.0035A174@zte.com.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: mif@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mif] 答复: RE: a question about rfc6418
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:51:22 -0000

This is an English error; the "not" should have been removed during editing.

I understand the origin of the error if the author was francophone.

I suggest using http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 2011-12-21 22:45, zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn wrote:
> until the user has NOT authenticated?
> 
> 
> Regards~~~
> 
> -Sujing Zhou
> 
> <pierrick.seite@orange.com> 写于 2011-12-21 17:42:34:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Nothing particular, this sentence reflects what the user is 
>> currently experiencing when getting access via a captive portal.
>>
>> Pierrick
>>
>> De : mif-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mif-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
>> zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn
>> Envoyé : mercredi 21 décembre 2011 10:38
>> À : mif@ietf.org
>> Objet : [mif] a question about rfc6418
>>
>>
>>     in Section 4.4 
>>
>>       The network requires a web-based authentication (e.g., the access
>>       network is a WiFi hot spot).  In this case, the user can only
>>       access a captive portal.  For instance, the network may perform
>>       HTTP redirection or modify DNS behavior (Section 4.1) until the
>>       user has not authenticated.
>>
>>    I am quite confused by the last word. Is it possible a typo or 
>> something particular? 
>>
>>
>> Regards~~~
>>
>> -Sujing Zhou
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mif mailing list
>> mif@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email