[mif] a question about rfc6418

zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn Wed, 21 December 2011 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E950C21F84DA for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:38:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P8et-cDgCLOB for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF3521F84C9 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:38:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 5669078017210; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:19:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 74270.78017210; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:38:35 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id pBL9cWcB038784 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:38:32 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn)
To: mif@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFB2BDD39D.C68275BF-ON4825796D.0034B867-4825796D.0034F852@zte.com.cn>
From: zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:38:26 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-12-21 17:38:34, Serialize complete at 2011-12-21 17:38:34
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0034F8504825796D_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn pBL9cWcB038784
Subject: [mif] a question about rfc6418
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:38:57 -0000

    in Section 4.4 

      The network requires a web-based authentication (e.g., the access
       network is a WiFi hot spot).  In this case, the user can only
       access a captive portal.  For instance, the network may perform
       HTTP redirection or modify DNS behavior (Section 4.1) until the
       user has not authenticated.

   I am quite confused by the last word. Is it possible a typo or 
something particular?


Regards~~~

-Sujing Zhou