IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] The formation of the design team

Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org> Thu, 04 April 2013 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mrw@lilacglade.org>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E6821F93E5 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AuMF3axXPZAp for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4349521F8B96 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from new-host-3.home (pool-71-184-79-25.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.184.79.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B3AD20218; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 07:39:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
In-Reply-To: <3713.1365036675@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:41:06 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F892D492-F779-448C-BAFC-9631C37385EF@lilacglade.org>
References: <CANF0JMAkCPYHotZ_j5YEDsB+CWPcjE2j1_sqO5iQ156-ebGbXQ@mail.gmail.com> <28783.1365004956@sandelman.ca> <515C5844.1020802@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775130765@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <3713.1365036675@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: MIF Mailing List <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] The formation of the design team
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:41:05 -0000

Hi Michael,

On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> I have recent poor experiences with large "design" teams that didn't
> keep enough records, and did not communicate with the WG.  

I am not sure how a design team could accomplish anything without communicating with the WG, since a design team is (from an IETF process standpoint) just  group of individuals who are working together to produce an IETF contribution.  It is up to the WG (1) whether to adopt that contribution as a WG work item, and (2) whether to publish it as an RFC…  

Margaret

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email