IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] Route option for DHCPv6 - next steps?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969DC11E80B0 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zC5HmirozpBs for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E2F11E80AC for <mif@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so666393obb.31 for <mif@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=5xR2lTDftROwRFXKAfJy8rMX6YHqJ9lDZp59oamMW2Y=; b=mCGzUSzWkzB+VKKpgouOQnOsHSiVYYns+Vpnk6hZmMLfUdOuCCUCWKqwyD/KB1S018 FrC1QrGD7558TM421hjTQFKuw6QRUTUbOMlv782zx/iCM+LFZ02X6W3KPzyEwnCVK6FW VmzGGAUlW1+JuDT/ofksosGCRvAIkSDHpvrhaA2ghb0Nbh6pw8COFXw1yplWepN9ETgE 4v3zukZBQgZ8m18YI9pCcNg9Py7y3y4YbDUWoN0C3JH1BcV9jGGXm0TpRnQzjOXg5pWI MZbhU2FyEDU6doXvdgE5k+GH4gezpVf5AFLrIL7cRkzswBiLU2Ao2+2LhVS7e6WpXuCq Jspg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=5xR2lTDftROwRFXKAfJy8rMX6YHqJ9lDZp59oamMW2Y=; b=es63yU0pbkiR4cmcl8cCDFOFpSW+kr+Kz1vtyB5ThnBXOcpGKJKYIfqzVKvHdrDQvh aN4dSZLH3ZmuI9L3X/qUW4D4K5fldJZiAPA1dum/PEZFm4y60uF8jc6JUOWYeMXRqUFl 7V4qt+NH3s9eU2+etcXmgcua8FxKr0F9YVWDW8VOoDnHN7gUC5pAx6Cnv6wSiCofGqc+ wZt6NeeM8IRocYSKdBqBXnHIN/5D/BAMyowmpudP042VzdvIxNoBBMk0xtwUSkxxqVLt S6QKGY9iiWxN03iMCmzaIuddniXUmcCCUaoMCVn9QbKZSIQuDxWoBwAyVDDgm2uk0OQa Tf6A==
Received: by 10.60.8.129 with SMTP id r1mr21717489oea.28.1335251921109; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.8.129 with SMTP id r1mr21717469oea.28.1335251920886; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.220.3 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE51370AD04A@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
References: <75459BC2-E733-45C0-BC1C-25A19BBA1137@gmail.com> <CAE97176.17DF4%wdec@cisco.com> <CANF0JMD_zfXGcfMy+rCOFXS1aCZ3RPHoRtkBeS8kDgOFcfQ8Fg@mail.gmail.com> <75D251D1-9828-4AFE-9BEF-B376E97133C7@nominum.com> <CANF0JMBbhrF0G=hSvcvyZAddAMW7oSO5KpzUmcJXCtwcnmyWOw@mail.gmail.com> <4A221CE5-ECF0-4E07-9329-E6BAA3F06A96@nominum.com> <4EC4AADB.8030803@piuha.net> <DD1241D5-B794-49C3-A3A2-4294248DDD10@gmail.com> <4F719186.3060507@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3tSoDPcheriWdZEeKyhqpDANCP7Co0wVVqK5+mXc7e5A@mail.gmail.com> <4F72CD22.3080604@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3RUUthiawKrmxjSNqzEbJcOLpHvDGb9XLtdiU-tfEYyw@mail.gmail.com> <4F744831.3070406@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307472D4175@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <4F7453FC.3010502@gmail.com> <4F74546D.4060808@gmail.com> <72C42575-6BE2-4F27-B7F4-AA4539DA7EF9@lilacglade.org> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307472D43A1@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <069301cd0dd2$5954df00$0bfe9d00$@tndh.net> <550B9F79-1642-469F-9ED3-96DA26AA40AB@lilacglade.org> <CAFFjW4hkGMm+mLSzpdWPcFLUcY3Hkyb+BDxh+5910YtfZxGD-A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+H2C9Zu3AS6aTxg1gebe0ZS2LXWmJjOPpbhaUHGZtXvF0UipQ@mail.gmail.com> <17F90720-AA1F-4F74-9598-2E5A5AC813CE@nttv6.net> <CAKD1Yr1s7SARfnowZV1uU=dDPi46-OjRQnM4otKsW3Y-k+84cw@mail.gmail.com> <F4D68CC2-27C5-4FB1-A11F-026E5261DB77@nttv6.net> <765F32AC-FBE3-4E8B-B698-1955C5601C2B@nominum.com> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE51370AD04A@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:18:20 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3UqnSaxdLYuQGAaAmdKH1m3BKbW=h=epWK_V4=+V2qUw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f839cbd6e1a3304be679095"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkTwuZtzsMNcRHWV5vz+CXxEL4TviDek9L1XzVLum49fTnAwPtyX3DuzPOETPOS5xyozwSBBwCUt02FoNUSn/+fPl44/oXRLlTzoAXFdHBiw0JnqgOwKN8N8COpxsEt2luc+WgE
Cc: MIF List Mailing <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] Route option for DHCPv6 - next steps?
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:18:42 -0000

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 16:06, Maglione Roberta <
roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it> wrote:

> Because in order to be able to use RA's you would need to somehow
> provision each single BNG (the router that is supposed to send the RA) with
> the route information to be sent into RA's for all the subscribers and if,
> for any reason, you need to move a subscriber from one BNG to another you
> would need to re-provision the same information on the other BNG.
>

Right. That's why RADIUS was mentioned earlier in this thread.


> While with DHCPv6 you can have a single centralized provision point and no
> additional configuration required on the BNG.  This is an operational
> difference for an operator.
>

But you have to update all the clients.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email