[mile] Late WG LC comment on SCI draft

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B478F21F96D9 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xt6pzUMEXJvf for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (hop-nat-141.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C567F21F8F4A for <mile@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id r6T6NUVg031467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <mile@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 02:23:30 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhubhoprd06.lss.emc.com [10.254.222.130]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <mile@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 02:23:24 -0400
Received: from mxhub06.corp.emc.com (mxhub06.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.203]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id r6T6NN7V005175 for <mile@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 02:23:23 -0400
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.184]) by mxhub06.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.203]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 02:23:23 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 02:23:21 -0400
Thread-Topic: Late WG LC comment on SCI draft
Thread-Index: Ac6MJB+y2rZpy0azT+ePKEtuP+shSA==
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712984AD5F1@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Subject: [mile] Late WG LC comment on SCI draft
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 06:23:38 -0000

Should the SCI draft be requiring that references to SCI documents
use the format in the IODEF Enumeration Reference Format draft
(draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-00)?

This seems like a good place to start using that reference format.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------