[Mip4] RE: Comments on VPN Problem Statement Draft
"Jayshree Bharatia" <jayshree@nortelnetworks.com> Thu, 31 July 2003 20:45 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13262 for <mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:45:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iKII-0004pJ-Go for mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:45:02 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6VKj2RJ018547 for mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:45:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iKII-0004p4-B8 for mip4-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:45:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13250 for <mip4-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:44:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iKIG-0007SH-00 for mip4-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:45:00 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iKIF-0007SE-00 for mip4-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:44:59 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iKIH-0004oq-9M; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:45:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iKI2-0004ob-0q for mip4@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:44:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13241 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iKI0-0007S8-00 for mip4@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:44:44 -0400
Received: from zrc2s0jx.nortelnetworks.com ([47.103.122.112]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iKHz-0007Rz-00 for mip4@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:44:43 -0400
Received: from zrc2c011.us.nortel.com (zrc2c011.us.nortel.com [47.103.120.51]) by zrc2s0jx.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id h6VKi3a22487; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:44:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by zrc2c011.us.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <301T8GX9>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:44:03 -0500
Message-ID: <870397D7C140C84DB081B88396458DAF746AA2@zrc2c000.us.nortel.com>
From: Jayshree Bharatia <jayshree@nortelnetworks.com>
To: "'Adrangi, Farid'" <farid.adrangi@intel.com>
Cc: "'mip4@ietf.org'" <mip4@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:43:59 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C357A4.77DC6E36"
Subject: [Mip4] RE: Comments on VPN Problem Statement Draft
Sender: mip4-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip4-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Hello Farid, As per our earlier discussion during IETF-57, my understanding is that you will include the scenario of co-existed FA with the VPN gateway in the VPN Problem Statement draft. I agree that this particular scenario has problems and it won't work if the MN is behind an FA in the foreign subnet. But again, this is a problem statement draft. Hence, I believe that this is the appropriate document for mentioning this scenario. Thanks, Jayshree -----Original Message----- From: Adrangi, Farid [mailto:farid.adrangi@intel.com] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 2:58 PM To: Bharatia, Jayshree [RICH1:2H13:EXCH] Cc: 'mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com' Subject: RE: Comments on VPN Problem Statement Draft Hello Jayshree This is a good point - I knew someone was to bring this up! At the time of writing these scenarios, we (the design team) actually discussed this and concluded this scenario would fall into a solution space. Maybe we did not make the right decision and we should rethink this. But, before we take this discussion further please allow me to ask you a few questions about the details of the scenario (VPN+FA) that you have in mind . Are you thinking to broadcast FA advertisements through the IPsec tunnel to the MN? If so, how will this work if MN is already behind an FA in the foreign subnet? Or, If you had something different in mind, perhaps you can elaborate on that. Best regards, Farid -----Original Message----- From: Jayshree Bharatia [mailto:jayshree@nortelnetworks.com] <mailto:%5bmailto:jayshree@nortelnetworks.com%5d> , Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:14 PM To: 'farid.adrangi@intel.com' Cc: 'mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com' Subject: Comments on VPN Problem Statement Draft Hello Farid, This draft (draft-ietf-mobileip-vpn-problem-statement-req-01) currently misses one scenario were the FA is co-existed with the VPN Gateway. I would think that there are no technical issues supporting this scenario. It will be good if you can add this scenario in the draft (perhaps as section 2.6?) for completeness. Thanks, Jayshree
- [Mip4] RE: Comments on VPN Problem Statement Draft Jayshree Bharatia
- [Mip4] RE: Comments on VPN Problem Statement Draft Adrangi, Farid
- [Mip4] RE: Comments on VPN Problem Statement Draft Jayshree Bharatia
- [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statement … Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Gopal Dommety
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Gopal Dommety
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Gopal Dommety
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Gopal Dommety
- Re: [Mip4] Re: FW: Comments on VPN Problem Statem… Qiang Zhang