Re: [Mip6] Comments on jee-mip6-bootstrap-pana

Julien Bournelle <Julien.Bournelle@int-evry.fr> Thu, 04 November 2004 13:37 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA19737 for <mip6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:37:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPi3O-00047b-EW for mip6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:53:31 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CPhf1-0008PB-UH; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:28:19 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CPhZC-0007JU-Hx for mip6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:22:19 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18348 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:22:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtp2.int-evry.fr ([157.159.10.45]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPhog-0003n2-12 for mip6@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:38:21 -0500
Received: from ipv6-5.int-evry.fr (ipv6-5.int-evry.fr [157.159.100.78]) by smtp2.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03722FEDA; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:22:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from jb by ipv6-5.int-evry.fr with local (Exim id 1CPhWv-0002zh-24; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:19:57 +0100
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:19:57 +0100
From: Julien Bournelle <Julien.Bournelle@int-evry.fr>
To: Junghoon Jee <jhjee@etri.re.kr>
Subject: Re: [Mip6] Comments on jee-mip6-bootstrap-pana
Message-ID: <20041104131957.GL10930@ipv6-5.int-evry.fr>
References: <2A8DB02E3018D411901B009027FD3A3F05319F6C@mchp905a.mch.sbs.de> <002b01c4c26d$2a6962f0$428feada@ETRIYSLEE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <002b01c4c26d$2a6962f0$428feada@ETRIYSLEE>
X-INT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-INT-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-INT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-5.817, requis 4.5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 0.08, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-MailScanner-From: jb@ipv6-5.int-evry.fr
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@samsung.com>, mip6@ietf.org, Tschofenig Hannes <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com>
X-BeenThere: mip6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5

hi,

 just a little comment inline,

> > ps: it might be good to reference an old draft
> > <draft-le-aaa-diameter-mobileipv6-02.txt> which proposed the same approach.
> > i also remember that julien published a draft with a similar idea some time
> > ago. 
> 
> The previous draft-le-aaa-diameter-mobileipv6-03.txt is a good reference for our work.
> In that draft, BU message is processed during the AAA auth. & authorization phase.
> The BU message can be piggybacked to the AAA auth request message 
> or it can be produced on the AAA server. 
> In the draft-jee-mip6-bootstrap-aaa-00, BU is processed after the AAA auth & authorization phase.
> This is because the BU MUST be protected by the IPsec SA according to the RFC 3775.
> If the  draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol-00.txt is used, 
> BU may be piggybacked during the AAA auth& authorization phase if the MN's CoA is configured.

I think that one of the major issue with this approach (defining a
specific AAA application for Mobile IPv6) is that all visited network
MUST use this specific AAA application if you want to bootstrapp Mobile
IPv6. Thus, if  the visited network uses
Diameter-EAP or RADIUS-EAP, you can't bootstrapp Mobile IPv6. This imply that all
operators should deploy this solution.

With our approach (draft-giaretta), the visited network does not need to
Mobile IPV6 aware.


-- 
julien.bournelle@int-evry.fr

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6