Re: [Mip6] mip6-aaa frameworks

hi hannes,

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:53:52PM +0100, Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
> 
> i think that framework 1 and 2 do not split the design space particularly
> well. draft-chowdhury-mip6-bootstrap-radius-00 and
> draft-le-aaa-mipv6-requirements-03.txt have a few things in common. 

they split the "AAA" approach. 

> i personally would like to see a solution that does not depend on protocols
> that do not necessary have to deal with the bootstrapping procedure itself. 
> 
> for example, what protocols do you use to provide the bootstrapping
> parameters to the end host and how many administrative domains do they
> traverse. when you run a bootstrapping procedure for mip6 (or for other
> protocols as well) then why do you need to depend on some infrastructure in
> the visited network (particularly when want something from the home
> network)? 

the idea is not to depend on some infrastructure. The "AAA" idea is that
we could have this infrastructure available and that in this case it can
be interesting to couple it with the bootstrapping procedure for
authorization and accounting purpose. 

however, we can't assume that we always have a AAA system. In this case,
we need framework 4 (or something else). Does this imply that we should reject
framwork 1-2 ?

-- 
julien.bournelle@int-evry.fr

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6