RE: [MIPSHOP-MIH-DT] draft-melia-mipshop-mstp-solution-01a.txt

<Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com> Thu, 15 November 2007 18:56 UTC

Return-path: <mipshop-mih-dt-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Isjsv-0002Cx-Na; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:56:17 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Isjsu-0002C8-Ji for mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:56:16 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Isjst-0003Kx-UC for mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:56:16 -0500
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext11.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id lAFItlWS010026; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:56:13 +0200
Received: from daebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.112]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:55:56 +0200
Received: from daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.24]) by daebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:55:53 -0600
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [MIPSHOP-MIH-DT] draft-melia-mipshop-mstp-solution-01a.txt
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:55:51 -0600
Message-ID: <E5E76343C87BB34ABC6C3FDF3B31272701B00512@daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <473C8C3A.9090402@nist.gov>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [MIPSHOP-MIH-DT] draft-melia-mipshop-mstp-solution-01a.txt
Thread-Index: Acgns1CdTPHyfAexSK+/PM71wzhVkAABT/hw
References: <4739D881.3000407@nw.neclab.eu> <E5E76343C87BB34ABC6C3FDF3B31272701ACD2A9@daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com><473C67CB.8000100@nw.neclab.eu> <473C8C3A.9090402@nist.gov>
From: Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com
To: nada.golmie@nist.gov, melia@nw.neclab.eu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2007 18:55:53.0106 (UTC) FILETIME=[25772F20:01C827B9]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976
Cc: JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com, mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIPSHOP Media Independent Handover Design Team List <mipshop-mih-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop-mih-dt>, <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/private/mipshop-mih-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop-mih-dt>, <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mipshop-mih-dt-bounces@ietf.org

A few issues:

Change the proposed sentence: "The MN SHOULD discover the server's
preferred transport mechanism to use in each service as defined in
[I-D.bajko-mos-dns-discovery]." to:

"The MN MAY use the procedures defined in [I-D.bajko-mos-dns-discovery]
to discover additional transport protocols supported by the server."

The sentence "Additionally, instead of retransmitting an unacknowledged
message, the MIH may choose to update the information and transmit a new
message." is out of context. We should talk about transport issues, and
not MIH level decisions. I would prefer NOT to add that sentence into
the draft.

- gabor 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Nada Golmie [mailto:nada.golmie@nist.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 10:13 AM
To: Telemaco Melia
Cc: Zuniga, Juan Carlos; mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MIPSHOP-MIH-DT] draft-melia-mipshop-mstp-solution-01a.txt

Hello All,

Juan-Carlos and I worked on this last paragraph in section 6. We believe
that section 6 is OK with the following change: 

1) Replace this paragraph:

It is mandatory the use of UDP and TCP as default transport
   mechanisms implemented in the server side.  The MN SHOULD discover
   server transport options.  The MN can choose one of the mandated
   transport protocols.  It is optional the use of SCTP both for server
   side and MN side.


with this one:

The server side MUST support both UDP and TCP for MIH transport, and the
MN MAY support either UDP or TCP. 
Additionally, the server and MN MAY support additional transport
mechanisms.
The MN SHOULD discover the server's preferred transport mechanism to use
in each service as defined in [I-D.bajko-mos-dns-discovery].



2) Add the following sentence at the end of last paragraph of section
6.3:

Additionally, instead of retransmitting an unacknowledged message, the
MIH may choose to update the information and transmit a new message.



3) Add the following reference to the end of first sentence of section
6:

Once the Mobility Services have been discovered, MIH peers MAY
   exchange information over TCP, UDP or any other transport supported
   by both the server and client, as described in [I-D.draft-rahman-
mipshop-mih-transport].

4) Add the following reference

[I-D.draft-rahman-mipshop-mih-transport]Rahman, A., Olvera-Hernandez,
U., Zuniga, JC., Wafta, M., and Kim, H.W., "Transport of Media
Independent Handover Messages Over IP,"
draft-rahmanmipshop-mih-transport-03 (work in progress), July 2007.

Any comments?

-Nada and Juan-Carlos


_______________________________________________
MIPSHOP-MIH-DT mailing list
MIPSHOP-MIH-DT@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop-mih-dt

_______________________________________________
MIPSHOP-MIH-DT mailing list
MIPSHOP-MIH-DT@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop-mih-dt