[MIPSHOP-MIH-DT] Current status

Telemaco Melia <telemaco.melia@netlab.nec.de> Thu, 30 August 2007 15:46 UTC

Return-path: <mipshop-mih-dt-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQmDv-0000H9-Sg; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:46:23 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQmDt-00009J-E2 for mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:46:22 -0400
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQmDr-0004rR-1S for mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:46:21 -0400
Received: from localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277ED280037E0 for <mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:46:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETOspWAMaY0P for <mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:46:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx1.office (mx1.office [10.1.1.23]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AB72800035C for <mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:46:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.1.1.217]) by mx1.office over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:46:10 +0200
Message-ID: <46D6E642.1030703@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:46:10 +0200
From: Telemaco Melia <telemaco.melia@netlab.nec.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org" <mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040509050506090408030607"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2007 15:46:11.0013 (UTC) FILETIME=[E366DF50:01C7EB1C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2d0bcffb66863314915c89d5f9c8a747
Subject: [MIPSHOP-MIH-DT] Current status
X-BeenThere: mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIPSHOP Media Independent Handover Design Team List <mipshop-mih-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop-mih-dt>, <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/private/mipshop-mih-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop-mih-dt>, <mailto:mipshop-mih-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mipshop-mih-dt-bounces@ietf.org

Dear all,

I have been reading the input Gabor provided with the IDs 
draft-bajko-mos-dhcp-options-00 and draft-bajko-mos-dns-discovery-00.
Thanks Gabor for the work. Here my comments:

o draft-bajko-mos-dhcp-options-00
-1 terminology section should be aligned with the PS doc
-2 introduction section: I do not think it is required, I would prefer 
to refer to the solution doc and move the text there if you want.
-3 discussion on co-located MoS: move it to the solution document when 
we talk about the transport

o draft-bajko-mos-dns-discovery-00
- same as before for 1 and 2
- refer to the solution document when you discuss on the selection of 
the transport

During the nect AC we should then discuss the open points noted in the 
draft.
I also would like to receive from Nada an update of the current status 
and see what text we can included in the first version of the document.

As for the time of the AC I would propose to have it at 14:00 CET on 
Tuesday September 4th.
Would  be fine with everybody?

Please le me know

Telemaco
_______________________________________________
MIPSHOP-MIH-DT mailing list
MIPSHOP-MIH-DT@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop-mih-dt