Re: [MLS] recharter text

> On Nov 10, 2023, at 14:59, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:29 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi! As discussed at the IWTF 118 session, the revised charter text can be found here:
>> https://github.com/mlswg/wg-materials/tree/main/wg-charter
>> 
>> Richard has already provided extension related text, i.e., listing the extensions we are going to work on:
>> https://github.com/mlswg/wg-materials/pull/14.
>> Please let us know here or in the repo whether you agree with the list of extensions. And, note that doing work on other extensions is likely going to require a recharter so let’s try to get this list right.
> 
> Does a saving clause of "such other extensions as the working group
> consensus deems advisable" sound good?  While I see from the record
> EKR wanted some scoping, I think having an explicit list of things to
> work on and then others is good enough.

I am concerned that somebody on the IESG might think of this as a blank check. I also really want to see if we can work through the existing set of extensions and then maybe recharter to something a little more loose.

spt

> Sincerely,
> Watson
> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> spt
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLS mailing list
>> MLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Astra mortemque praestare gradatim