IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] Permissions

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Mon, 23 February 2009 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D545D28C145 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id izjBHyI8sMSe for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com (mail-gx0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA2F28C120 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22so5710247gxk.13 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DrYCGCF8kiMfcFvh4SQdIv06tDwXJQi/jWqp36IowDQ=; b=x0q2tYLku+cUJJ9bZ70xMxEI5TM6pt/xD1B//Rvb/IhXjXQLU39gJPiGn2DcstpYt4 P6TYKU0Vp2K10V791Wj5QOXQCdDdKARRvH7IHCt1CGV8z+zMoMfA7vfhaqqWAEoGVTRl lMdWjUmZiudEKKlu4FPw2xFGkaeCPj+OYAVKQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jWEMjH3K7xkWGBeZB3lVLn2P3uGoZvrq7BczsPPFHHM06AHMYESMQ1dnCu6IfZIJJI ARGVPhE/cLteO/1dLnrMy8HNhWcotNULoCSrrfqRUzWA8Ej/TWCWG7TsD2+sx7sBfaIu 1J5rl2nflXqqXNiK9afXGaaFyS7CfVXvDn9bk=
Received: by 10.100.108.9 with SMTP id g9mr2365220anc.68.1235421928038; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.168.111? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d38sm13611716and.29.2009.02.23.12.45.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A30AE5.6060307@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:25 -0800
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jesrad <jesrad@gmail.com>
References: <61dbdd7d0902230059u69e87ed3n3a85b905593c11@mail.gmail.com> <53cd6c2e0902230118v12f271a5u2657a358821f4d09@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53cd6c2e0902230118v12f271a5u2657a358821f4d09@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mmox@ietf.org" <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] Permissions
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:45:11 -0000

Jesrad wrote:
> Imagine for a second that the cross-grid protocol mandate somehow that
> objects made on one grid be hosted and served to clients from this
> grid, and not transfered to other grid servers / simulators (though
> the owner may have the third-party possibility of exporting from one
> and importing to another so it is hosted multiple times and thus
> exists in multiple instances).
>
>   

How then would the soccer ball on my server be able to affect the soccer 
goal on your server? If only the clients know about the entities from 
the 2 servers, your "goal" object on your server would never detect the 
presence of the "ball" object within its "goal zone."

This is why I believe that direct client distribution is not actually 
the right model.

Sincerely,

jw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email