IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] IETF 96 MMUSIC Meeting: Move to Friday ?

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Sun, 17 July 2016 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3001412D500 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFYKHXuNfY5Y for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC77412D16D for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.99.1] (dhcp-b096.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.176.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u6HDqwkb033746 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 17 Jul 2016 08:52:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host dhcp-b096.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.176.150] claimed to be [192.168.99.1]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:52:57 +0200
Message-ID: <76A93E1A-EEB9-4039-8FE3-3C13E1457180@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <9546b8e9-3ff2-bf7f-15f5-d6fa3703f33f@nostrum.com>
References: <5062dbbc-3753-9a4b-22fa-f2a3a3cd1470@cisco.com> <6FBB4E31-F1DE-42B5-BAC5-4EE35AF07378@nostrum.com> <9546b8e9-3ff2-bf7f-15f5-d6fa3703f33f@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/CNMPG68IVrclnTdDGCKxLYq_uWo>
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] IETF 96 MMUSIC Meeting: Move to Friday ?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 13:53:04 -0000

Perc is at 1000 (Fri morning). The slot we are talking about is at 1220 
(friday afternoon I)

On 17 Jul 2016, at 15:44, Adam Roach wrote:

> On 7/17/16 11:38, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> I note that the MMUSIC agenda is primarily (entirely?) about RTCWEB 
>> dependencies. I assume that most interested parties also had planned 
>> to attend the Friday RTCWEB meeting. If we do not see major 
>> objections really soon[1] (as in the next few hours) I will request 
>> the change.
>
> MMUSIC <-> PERC seems like a pretty unfortunate conflict -- moreso 
> than MMUSIC <-> QUIC, when you consider commonality.
>
> /a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email