IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] IETF 96 MMUSIC Meeting: Move to Friday ?

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sun, 17 July 2016 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A27D12D0AB for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LdexCOwO6reo for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8056A12D09D for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b26d.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b26d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.178.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u6HDiHtv032778 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 17 Jul 2016 08:44:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
References: <5062dbbc-3753-9a4b-22fa-f2a3a3cd1470@cisco.com> <6FBB4E31-F1DE-42B5-BAC5-4EE35AF07378@nostrum.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <9546b8e9-3ff2-bf7f-15f5-d6fa3703f33f@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:44:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6FBB4E31-F1DE-42B5-BAC5-4EE35AF07378@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/fw55zKYe51Athc_CaSQ_3ZBxSrU>
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] IETF 96 MMUSIC Meeting: Move to Friday ?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 13:44:25 -0000

On 7/17/16 11:38, Ben Campbell wrote:
> I note that the MMUSIC agenda is primarily (entirely?) about RTCWEB 
> dependencies. I assume that most interested parties also had planned 
> to attend the Friday RTCWEB meeting. If we do not see major objections 
> really soon[1] (as in the next few hours) I will request the change.

MMUSIC <-> PERC seems like a pretty unfortunate conflict -- moreso than 
MMUSIC <-> QUIC, when you consider commonality.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email