Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE TEXT: Answerer Procedures (29th May)

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 30 May 2013 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=88623dc6f3=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C936E21F9413 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 23:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dCfbei-fpWgt for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 23:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE7021F9410 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 23:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f9e6d000002643-7f-51a6f159d1f7
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 4A.E0.09795.951F6A15; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:27:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC007.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.39]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:27:37 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE TEXT: Answerer Procedures (29th May)
Thread-Index: Ac5cYL6Xjkqad1ozQWuoyGt6QctbSAABoqcAACXMJdA=
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 06:27:37 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C37CFE4@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C37B973@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <51A60F50.9020902@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <51A60F50.9020902@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7Ux2WBBjdecFlMXf6YxWLFhgOs Dkwef99/YPJYsuQnUwBTFLdNUmJJWXBmep6+XQJ3xt7r89gLdulX3Jk1m6mBcY9yFyMHh4SA icT150VdjJxAppjEhXvr2UBsIYHDjBJdp0S7GLmA7CWMEp17X7GB1LMJWEh0/9MGqRER8JV4 9vg2WL2wgKPE7qtnmCDiThJPf61hh7CtJGatvcQMYrMIqEqc3XcNrIYXqPfFaYi4kEC+xNSF PWD1nAI6EptunQarYQS65/upNWA2s4C4xK0n85kg7hSQWLLnPDOELSrx8vE/VohXFCWW98tB lOtILNj9iQ3C1pZYtvA1M8RaQYmTM5+wTGAUnYVk6iwkLbOQtMxC0rKAkWUVI3tuYmZOern5 JkZgHBzc8ttgB+Om+2KHGKU5WJTEefV5FwcKCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbFF5XmpBYfYmTi4AQRXFIN jFsTds9N2TDn2SIP3jW5sj2e09NvN3Rc23M4deL+nTclt+1i86ra+dZR+djJXwESJh323//O O54vEjUzUlTIgFtnoZXgljec3/9u/DprmRrL+cdZT1h+HDxo4/7R60nOj3yBksSrv4ukm/f3 fLXUfFPleulT5qlpkqWR75WvbshVll43696i81eUWIozEg21mIuKEwFd911nVgIAAA==
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE TEXT: Answerer Procedures (29th May)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 06:27:44 -0000

Hi,

> This seems good to me, pending polishing the language.
>
> I trust when you say "address information" you mean:
> - the port in the m-line
> - the address in the c-line
> - associated ICE information
>
> Obviously it would be cumbersome to mention all of that each time you need to refer to address information. So I'm expecting you will coin a term (e.g., "address information") and provide a definition of it.

Yes. There is going to be a separate section which describes that more in detail. 

Thanks!

Regards,

Christer




On 5/29/13 7:39 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on the e-mail and interim discussions, I've tried together some 
> "Answerer Procedures" text for BUNDLE.
>
> For now, I would request that people mainly focus on the technical 
> stuff, and if some text is unclear. I WILL align the usage of "m=" 
> line and "media description" :)
>
> Also note that examples will be added later.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> 6.4.  Answerer Procedures
>
> 6.4.1.  General
>
>     This section describes how an Answerer, when it receives an SDP 
> Offer
>
>     including a BUNDLE group, generates the associated SDP Answer.
>
>     When an Answerer receives an SDP Offer which includes a BUNDLE 
> group,
>
>     and the Answerer accepts the offered BUNDLE group, the Answerer 
> MUST
>
>     generate an SDP Answer according to the procedures in Section 6.1 
> and
>
>     this section.
>
> 6.4.2.  RFC 5888 restrictions
>
>     Based on the rules and procedures in RFC 5888, the following
>
>     restrictions also apply to BUNDLE groups in SDP Answers:
>
>     o  1) A BUNDLE group must not be added to an SDP Answer, unless 
> the
>
>        same BUNDLE group was included in the associated SDP Offer; and
>
>     o  2) An SDP "m=" line must not be added to a BUNDLE group in the 
> SDP
>
>        Answer, unless it in the associated SDP Offer was included in 
> the
>
>        same BUNDLE group.
>
> 6.4.3.  Offerer Bundle Address Selection
>
>     In the SDP Answer, the Answerer selects the bundle address for the
>
>     Offerer, based on the address information received in the 
> associated
>
>     SDP Offer, using the mid value.  The mid value associated with the
>
>     "m=" line in the SDP Offer that represents the bundle address MUST 
> in
>
>     the SDP Answer be located first in the mid value list added to SDP
>
>     group:BUNDLE attribute associated with the BUNDLE group.
>
>     From the associated SDP Offer, the Answerer SHOULD choose the 
> bundle
>
>     address associated with the mid value located first in the mid 
> value
>
>     list included in the SDP group:BUNDLE attribute associated with 
> the
>
>     BUNDLE group, unless:
>
>     o  1) The mid value represents an "m=" line with a port zero value 
> in
>
>        the SDP Offer; or
>
>     o  2) The mid value represents an "m=" line with a port zero value 
> in
>
>        the SDP Answer.
>
>     OPEN: The decision for allowing a media description with port zero
>
>     values inside a BUNDLE group is pending on update for RFC 5888.
>
> 6.4.4.  Answerer Bundle Address Selection
>
>     In the SDP Answer, the Answerer selects its local bundle address.
>
>     Each "m=" line included in a BUNDLE group MUST contain identical
>
>     address information.  The only exception is the usage of a zero 
> port
>
>     value for an "m=" line, which is allowed eventhough another port
>
>     value number is used for other "m=" lines in the BUNDLE group.
>
>     OPEN: The decision for allowing a media description with port zero
>
>     values inside a BUNDLE group is pending on update for RFC 5888.
>
>     In a subsequent SDP Answer, the Answerer MAY change its local 
> bundle
>
>     address, as long as each "m=" line included the BUNDLE group 
> contain
>
>     identical address information.
>
>     For a given BUNDLE group, the Answerer MUST NOT assign the bundle
>
>     address to "m=" lines that are not included the BUNDLE group, or 
> to
>
>     "m=" lines that are included in another BUNDLE group.
>
> 6.4.5.  Rejecting A BUNDLE Media Description
>
>     When generating the SDP Answer, if the Answerer wants to reject 
> media
>
>     associated with an "m=" line in the BUNDLE group, it will add a 
> zero
>
>     port number value to the "m=" line, according to the procedures
>
>     defined in RFC 3264.
>
>     OPEN ISSUE: It is FFS whether it is allowed to include a port zero
>
>     media descriptions in a BUNDLE group.
>
> 6.4.6.  Removing a media description from a BUNDLE group
>
>     When generating the SDP Answer, if the Answerer wants to remove an
>
>     "m=" line from a BUNDLE group (without rejecting the "m=" line),it
>
>     MUST NOT include the "m=" line in a BUNDLE group.  In addition, 
> the
>
>     SDP Answer MUST not add its local bundle address to the "m=" line.
>
>     An Answerer MUST NOT, in the SDP Answer, remove an "m=" line from 
> a
>
>     BUNDLE group, unless the "m=" line had unique address information 
> in
>
>     the associated SDP Offer.
>
>     NOTE: The reason for the restriction above is that, if the "m=" 
> line
>
>     would be removed from the BUNDLE group, the address information 
> would
>
>     be identical to the "m=" lines remaining in the BUNDLE group.
>
>     OPEN: The decision for allowing a media description with port zero
>
>     values inside a BUNDLE group is pending on update for RFC 5888.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic