Re: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02

MMUSIC,

The plan in Yokohama was to start moving towards WGLC after a few updates were made.

It seems to me that this document is now fairly stable. I assume the changes mentioned below will be included in an -04 (-03 already posted).

Please read the document and comment whether or not it is ready for WGLC.

/Bo & Flemming
MMUSIC co-chairs

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: den 8 december 2015 22:13
> To: Paul Kyzivat; mmusic@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >Section 8 consists solely of section 8.1. The 8.1 is redundant.
> 
> Correct. There was supposed to be a chapter 8.2 too, and when it was removed I forgot to fix the rest.
> 
> >Section 10 looks a little weird, because it has the section numbering
> >for the updated documents mixed >in with the section numbering of this
> >document. I'm not sure of long term plans. Is this stuff to >eventually
> >be removed once everyone agrees on what is to be done? Or is it to
> >remain? If it is going to >be removed, then what you have is fine. If
> >it is going to stay, then I think something needs to be done >to make
> >the presentation less confusing. (E.g., indent it and/or move into an
> >appendix.)
> 
> I don't think it is going to be removed. This document updates the listed RFC, and the updated text will not be anywhere
> else (unless someone decides to incorporate the text into a bis, which at least is not my intention).
> 
> We can look at the section numbering, and see whether it can be made more clear. Perhaps the section number of the
> updated sections don't need to be in the updated text, as we already say which sections are updated.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> On 12/8/15 2:48 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A new version (-02) of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02 has been submitted.
> >
> > Note that this version now suggests updates to RFC 5763 (SRTP-DTLS)
> > and RFC 7341 (UDPTL-DTLS), so I encourage people to take a look.
> >
> > In addition, there is some new text about re-using connection-oriented
> > (read: acknowledged packet delivery) for establishing a new DTLS
> > association.
> >
> > You can also find the document on github:
> > https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-dtls-sdp
> >
> > (NOTE: This is my personal repo, as I am not aware of any "official"
> > MMUSIC repo)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Christer
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mmusic mailing list
> > mmusic@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic