IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 December 2015 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A281A0108 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 03:41:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HW8zyE3H56Ei for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 03:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CDC41A0104 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 03:41:31 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79df6d0000013b1-c0-567936e9e0bb
Received: from ESESSHC016.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.66]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 20.A8.05041.9E639765; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:41:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.76]) by ESESSHC016.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.66]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:40:37 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02
Thread-Index: AdExjA3IyAWMhHx8TcSQrk715+uNGQHgdVwAABXwN3AAh2IMAABKkgZw
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:40:36 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37CF7CAA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37C8B1E5@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnVUy+FiRps1KWAkmhbTvS0UsYy70t4XRmWWE9x1Gp11Cw@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37CED885@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnVE8QM8fT624G50-Oa8ZS_DT78HS1PP=nRD9tzptLJoww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVE8QM8fT624G50-Oa8ZS_DT78HS1PP=nRD9tzptLJoww@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.147]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmplkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbHdSfelWWWYwZaXEhbXzvxjtJi6/DGL A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXxcEIXY8Es1opz97czNzB2sHYxcnJICJhI bDl7H8oWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAYUaJU0cuMEI4ixklzv08BlTFwcEmYCHR/U8bpEFEQFdi0dkH 7CBhZgF1iauLg0DCwgJuEuc/9jNBlLhLXPh+jBnCdpOYd/s1C4jNIqAq8XrmRDYQm1fAV2J9 91SoVfOZJJ4eWQHWzCkQKDHpXyOYzQh03PdTa8BsZgFxiVtP5jNBHC0gsWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/ YGdKCChJTNuaBnGapsT6XfoQnYoSU7ofskOsFZQ4OfMJywRGsVlIhs5C6JiFpGMWko4FjCyr GEWLU4uLc9ONjPRSizKTi4vz8/TyUks2MQIj5+CW31Y7GA8+dzzEKMDBqMTDu2FPRZgQa2JZ cWXuIUYJDmYlEV4t7cowId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rzNTA9ChQTSE0tSs1NTC1KL YLJMHJxSDYzemfNFtDIbF5hxrl/Q2+XK3vzy3+T/NfPOx52YeWJdWsrGS5U7ri5/E7moUVrk 4YSqVpPUDidJ9WdzZj7vN4szEsqTsLcs9xZZcJ6h+OHW/s0/p1pN5FmzqCJDorLs3GIRUdl1 Fpf/Vhz5uP7kya5nKhqv2HU37jBX7U+fXab+++n1jG9T+iYosRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAkjRmq5gC AAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/IOkfQupGZbl2hxLrJsMaAuOh1VM>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:41:33 -0000

Hi,

...

>>> I think that the 5245 change is incorrect though because it loses some important details.
>>
>> Do you mean some other RFC? The draft does not update RFC 5245. Or, do you mean that some reference to RFC 5245 is incorrect?
>
> Sorry, it was the last 7345 change that I was talking about.

Everything that is removed from 7345 is supposed to be covered in dtls-sdp.

Or, is there some specific stuff that you think is completely lost?

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email