Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ivov-dispatch-trickle-ice-sip/draft-ivov-mmusic-trickle-ice

["Stach, Thomas" <[e-mail]>]

inline

Emil Ivov wrote:
> Hey Marc and thanks for your comments!
> 
> Replies inline.
> 
> On 02.04.13, 17:45, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>> 
>> I read draft-ivov-dispatch-trickle-ice-sip and
>> draft-ivov-mmusic-trickle-ice during the preparation of the
>> rfc5245bis draft and I have some suggestions that I will be
>> presenting step by step below: 
>> 
>> 1. The 180 needs to be reliable
> 
> Agreed. We'll make the change in the next revision.
> 
The answer with any initial candidates needs to be in a 183 not a 180.
In addition, I don't think that the 183 needs to be reliable.
This was not necessary for RFC5245 and could also be avoided for trickle ICE, since the
INFO with the new candidates is already reliably sent. 
If the INFO contains always the complete list of candidates (instead of just a delta), the ICE agents will 
eventually have all candidates even if the 183 with the initial candidates got lost with the initial candidates.
As an optimisation if you don't want to always send the complete list, 
you could just include it in the first INFO and use deltas afterwards.


Regards
Thomas