Re: [MMUSIC] Updating the pacing of ICE connectivity checks

Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> Thu, 14 February 2013 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D391221F8623 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6bAp4qQn9MI for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1594D21F85B8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:44:34 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f316d0000028db-8f-511d06617387
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A4.02.10459.1660D115; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:44:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:44:33 +0100
Received: from tri62.nomadiclab.com (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924B5233F; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:44:33 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <511D0660.5020607@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:44:32 +0200
From: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
References: <511CEB64.6070306@ericsson.com> <05a401ce0ac6$db547230$91fd5690$@cisco.com> <511D03A7.1060008@ericsson.com> <511D0498.3030909@jitsi.org>
In-Reply-To: <511D0498.3030909@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW4Sm2ygwbSnvBYXrz1kslizcwKL xdTlj1kcmD2m/N7I6rFkyU8mj/9vAgOYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyTk84zVbQxVJxbMN/xgbG 6cxdjJwcEgImEntbnzBC2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjJKLHi9kJ2CGcDo8TitiYoZwujxJble5hA WngFtCU2/F4J1s4ioCrxa+93sDibgL3EzQnX2UFsUYFkiY93rrFC1AtKnJz5hAXEFhGQl+hu WwRWzyxgJfG2vRfsJGEBF4nXTd+gzpjCKLFpw3OgBAcHp4CmxOtFIhD1thIX5lxngbDlJba/ nQPWKwR0w9V/rxgnMArNQrJuFpKWWUhaFjAyr2Jkz03MzEkvN9zECAzgg1t+6+5gPHVO5BCj NAeLkjhvmOuFACGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2MoQe+S87NXVl390KDRXh54m6p xlL/W2qfnYT3pKln+13tOFf68+i13/vPVz1dbvJXxeXO79/qU7dfF/rGd3rzhke6xqmKGu3C Ngdu9gbuY9qrqNrtKrtr6f+lBd/X3PFe+PRI3Lo550VfvP8jxNOjaPh6lmN5ueSCt4/0pI+7 cr8W77hY1dNgoMRSnJFoqMVcVJwIABz69eguAgAA
Cc: 'mmusic' <mmusic@ietf.org>, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Updating the pacing of ICE connectivity checks
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:44:35 -0000

On 2/14/13 5:36 PM, Emil Ivov wrote:
> Any idea why there had to be different pacing for RTP and non-RTP flows
> in the first place?

Because with RTP you know the to-be-used bandwidth and can match checks 
with that (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5245#section-16.1):
>    These formulas are aimed at causing STUN transactions to be paced at
>    the same rate as media.  This ensures that ICE will work properly
>    under the same network conditions needed to support the media as
>    well.


Cheers,
Ari