Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE
Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 May 2013 08:17 UTC
Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403B721F9377 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.673
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.673 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RikN5ZcJLLQz for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f51.google.com (mail-qe0-f51.google.com [209.85.128.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A764321F8E06 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id nd7so1704316qeb.38 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XL7nG56jmM+fbEDwPvPnE/kzPd6EeVhTIwCw8xIJi+g=; b=NiXvNtgIlnxtm2JD/yBSXeZPucng+FcFErrqvNNKsIYVTZPBNDItt6TJzD4k6UEqrw lZjT4WJI95ei9KqNuAbCFV10I2UbHGH/s8zw86CMRn/I5L9cYz09WDsEfmp1vPNK4nsx hBFDXEBJSOShGwATHj92VafHaNyCg6TWYr1ueUTehQszwZUA03tScf86kG5rQRETv+tl zrPJUjUaragUUnU4nanJSBbxFpP4M6LUgc9LjLzfTbw+okYAb3Ek7Y2W3tMyWZP3rP0u MXHbHosDecy5tcW44YESdIwlRj3+imup0cgIufd9AYUCHR3U7ntJYTkZNklb7a8HkVV4 u3fQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.17.10 with SMTP id q10mr4107531qca.21.1369297071048; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.25.14 with HTTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0OfJehPUtH33+r5O6Vjok9x7VrAB-a5tpPnzxNKMA3HA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36F22F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <519103E1.8030200@alum.mit.edu> <201305132353.r4DNrTrr4646686@shell01.TheWorld.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3700A9@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113508B39@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-0OfJehPUtH33+r5O6Vjok9x7VrAB-a5tpPnzxNKMA3HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 01:17:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGSJGOu8jeopjeDP3QO5EC4dXZ-_E84hHfPTnudcgN9EFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015175cf92a8338a804dd5e516a"
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:17:56 -0000
+ 1 If the Answerer decides to move the m=line to a different BUNDLE group, i support rejecting and re-offering than doing 1 or 2 above, Thanks Suhas On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > Agree completely. Otherwise media may show up at an unexpected port for > the offerer. > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) < > fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: > >> >> On May 14, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Christer Holmberg < >> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> >>>> We seem to have an agreement that, when an SDP offer contains an m- >> >>>> line associated with a bundle group, it is ok to leave that m- line >> >>>> outside the bundle group in the SDP Answer. >> >>>> >> >>> Now, there has been some discussions about b> >> >>> Yes, this is the conclusion I reached. I wish it weren't true. But I >> >>> think there must be a mechanism for the new bundle to be rejected, and >> >>> if it is first proposed in the answer then that isn't possible. >> >>> >> >>> IMO this is a rare enough case that suffering another O/A is >> acceptable. >> >> >> >> I agree with Paul here. >> > >> > Me too :) >> > >> >> Allowing a new group (bundle) to be created in an answer is a much >> larger deviation from RFC 5888 than allowing an m= line with a zero port to >> be in a group, and the accept/reject problem can't be solved. >> > >> > Note that there are two cases: >> > >> > 1) A new bundle is created in the answer >> > >> > 2) An m- line is moved from bundle_x in the offer to bundle_y in the >> answer. bundle_y was also present in the offer, so it is not created by the >> answerer. >> > >> > In my opinion 2) should not be allowed either, as the m- line was not >> present in bundle_y in the offer. >> > >> >> Agree with you and to say more … >> >> I think that both 1 and 2 should *not* be allowed. There is no use case >> to drive needing them and it is complicated. That can be done with a new >> offer if needed. >> >> >> > Regards, >> > >> > Christer >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > mmusic mailing list >> > mmusic@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mmusic mailing list >> mmusic@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > >
- [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Dale R. Worley
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Dale R. Worley
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE Suhas Nandakumar