IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Difficulties accepting and rejecting with bundling

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Wed, 13 March 2013 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8519321F8CB8 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g7efR0dNOGOB for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2768B21F8C7C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 15so370194wgd.7 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iEtN6ewDMlrr3b93i6UeyN8x+3rkmpZyr0jwryANgD4=; b=a38bjAAixJ5dkcstvh4Xn5DDkfmz/rxwteAIogohO1MRZl6RCPpMhYhinE0DEDRaWd 6VIsm0Rri9S5+M7mvjf+vPi3n7JMZlPkzgYx1gwe/14vXLGHYp4Lg+v1yl9uTOSkLJpN 44D/nGHJiunH03WIH+o8sV1RysFtzwPBLNMpVYgOqzqwRYwUYoft0K/J17kZ0cgqHhHa bNCC2410Zgag2xLnBH/U/mds6EjMiRfCGuxVUfawPC4htSRqLQm7/JxvOVrHRxVXWcNw yG5HgURU4S9WiybK1Y2TGjvJLiMg5GIuU4vilzX8/YPZ1NSlS/6obEJaLlLMmVnclC9y mJew==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.85.97 with SMTP id g1mr29810334wiz.29.1363206299307; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.16.170 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F36EB8C95@US70TWXCHMBA12.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <201303110237.r2B2btIS180463@shell01.TheWorld.com> <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F36EB73DA@US70TWXCHMBA12.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <201303112150.r2BLocqs234131@shell01.TheWorld.com> <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F36EB74CA@US70TWXCHMBA12.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <201303120102.r2C12W0g240047@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CAMRcRGQ-eJi4zdVLe5amdv-nGzUfabQvsArFH8nj75u7j97ycg@mail.gmail.com> <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F36EB8C95@US70TWXCHMBA12.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:24:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGS_d512J_8hX2Qe6ykH9G_PhxCwr6kED+JNknGxc-_xNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: "Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)" <richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0444036c39d6b104d7d4330f"
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Difficulties accepting and rejecting with bundling
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:25:10 -0000

Ah ! my bad, That's true

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard) <
richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

>  The direction attribute is one that needs to be preserved for each m
> line to indicate direction of the media associated with that m line.  It is
> just not available for other purposes.  Furthermore, inactive does not
> disable ICE or RTCP, which would still be expected to proceed.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Suhas Nandakumar [mailto:suhasietf@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:38 PM
> *To:* Dale R. Worley
> *Cc:* Ejzak, Richard P (Richard); mmusic@ietf.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [MMUSIC] Difficulties accepting and rejecting with bundling
> ****
>
>  ** **
>
> I am just curios ... instead of playing with connection address and port
> numbers for indicating accepting/rejecting a m=line in BUNDLE O/A, would
> making a particular m=line direction inactive make things simpler ....****
>
> since for m=lines with direction as inactive would mean no ICE setup , no
> reject port needed , no resource allocation on intermediary(?) ****
>
> ** **
>
> Any thoughts ?****
>
> ** **
>
> ./Suhas****
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>
> wrote:****
>
> > From: "Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)" <richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com>
> >****
>
> > This is the only compatibility concern identified with the
> > asymmetric use of the unspecified address, but this concern is
> > clearly misplaced for rtcweb applications where ICE and consent are
> > mandatory.****
>
> I'm not limiting my attention to WebRTC only.  Even in situations
> where WebRTC is gatewayed to existing SIP infrastructure these
> problems appear.  If we restrict ourselves to WebRTC, then we have
> even more freedom, and in that case, I'd simply remove the rule
> regarding rejects MDs as members of groups.****
>
>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic****
>
> ** **
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email