IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Unified Plan for SDP Handling

Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C48121F9FE4 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f+6DlEYznIdd for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (mxout.myoutlookonline.com [64.95.72.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D1D21F9ED4 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43A47AB48C; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan
Received: from HUB012.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432817AB441; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from BE235.mail.lan ([10.110.32.235]) by HUB012.mail.lan ([10.110.17.12]) with mapi; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:03:39 -0400
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:05:38 -0400
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Unified Plan for SDP Handling
Thread-Index: Ac6CcEr+ZUecbb5ASLywAYKTd1LmBQ==
Message-ID: <EEE6BE4D-A231-4731-B824-B035BA099479@vidyo.com>
References: <51E447C8.1000701@nostrum.com> <009001ce8263$0ed498b0$2c7dca10$@gmail.com> <51E5AF5A.9050405@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E5AF5A.9050405@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Unified Plan for SDP Handling
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:05:51 -0000

On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 7/16/13 15:28, Roni Even wrote:
>> Adam,
>> For correlation when the SSRC is not known in the SDP look at
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-even-mmusic-multiple-streams-02.txt and the
>> option to use SDES and not only RTP header extension.
> 
> Roni:
> 
> Thanks for the pointer. That's an interesting approach; however, for 
> RTCWEB at least, need a solution that also works with DTLS-SRTP.


Acronym collision: This uses RTCP Source Description packets, not SDP Security Descriptions.

I think the (related) app-id approach described in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-even-mmusic-application-token-00.txt will also be of interest.

--
Jonathan Lennox
jonathan@vidyo.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email