Re: [MMUSIC] M-line philosophy (Re: Wisdom sought: Prioritization of codecs)

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 22 November 2012 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD59E21F8974 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 04:35:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.246, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7MOdSC7kpae for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 04:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396C321F896F for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 04:35:30 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f1e6d000002d2c-ae-50ae1c101833
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 93.65.11564.01C1EA05; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:35:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSHC010.ericsson.se (153.88.183.48) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.90) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:35:27 +0100
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.119]) by ESESSHC010.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:35:26 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] M-line philosophy (Re: Wisdom sought: Prioritization of codecs)
Thread-Index: AQHNxhSSFrVLd/9YXUaLOlsJI1Ryp5fzCQOAgAKzgwCAABIuUA==
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:35:26 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B04227A@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <50A4AC20.5030306@alvestrand.no> <50A4AE7F.4040403@alvestrand.no>, <50A51F04.5090502@alum.mit.edu> <50A54895.7030006@nostrum.com>, <50A9BFD4.3000601@alvestrand.no> <BLU002-W219B21BE1C13A009AE59C0B93550@phx.gbl> <50AE1A2C.4040201@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <50AE1A2C.4040201@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja6AzLoAg+sr1S32L7nMbHGsr4vN YuryxywOzB5XJlxh9Xjcc4bNY8mSn0wBzFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGbc7XjAVXGCvuLHwEVsD YxtbFyMnh4SAicTvT9uZIWwxiQv31gPFuTiEBE4ySkyZtY4dwtnJKDHn3GMoZwmjxJlVs1m6 GDk42AQsJLr/aYN0iwhEStx4epQZJMwsoC5xdXEQSFhYIFyi4U4nM0RJhMS0ZbuZIGwniaOt vewg5SwCqhJrl+iChHkFvCX6VrewQmxqZ5L4+OUl2EhOAV2J+z2cIDWMQHd+P7UGbAyzgLjE rSfzmSDuF5BYsuc81C+iEi8f/2OFsBUldp5tZ4ao15O4MXUKG4StLbFs4WtmiL2CEidnPmEB sYWA4i2LJ7BPYJSYhWTFLCTts5C0z0LSvoCRZRUje25iZk56ueEmRmCUHdzyW3cH46lzIocY pTlYlMR5uZL2+wsJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpglOReF/i5ulbJS6OiYrt6W+rM T5k3XNzXXHbri64ofyb8ZYu7mdIzu8cingLs218m7G749jPQvj73hMx6Dv1+qSevr82x4Px9 +8Sh3JeisYwiT14VsG/Ym99WvVP5QUZBFPdNs+tnGF+k84bIV7dObC9mtwn9YfbtnEGKy5KH XjJsR2XFf9YosRRnJBpqMRcVJwIABmloeYACAAA=
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] M-line philosophy (Re: Wisdom sought: Prioritization of codecs)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:35:31 -0000

Hi,

>> The M-line is problematic because it binds together multiple things:
>> 
>> - A set of parameters for media transmission *in all directions* (bound to payload type)
>
>[BA] RFC 3264 Section 5.1 makes it clear that the parameters need not apply in all directions (though sendrecv is the default): 
>
>agreed. What I find more problematic / irritating is that with parameters that apply to both directions of a sendrecv stream, there's no way to specify one set that applies A->B and another set that applies  B->A.
>With sendonly / recvonly streams, this is not an issue; with parameters that apply only in one direction (such as crypto keys), it is also not an issue. But for some parameters, it is an issue.

The root to these problems is that fact that, at one point many earth spins ago, the community made a decision that with SIP/SDP you only need to indicate your receiving capabilities...

Regards,

Christer