Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and updates/corrections
Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Thu, 20 September 2012 14:23 UTC
Return-Path: <emil@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0036C21F8779 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXc9luyPRBOu for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ED121F8746 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so321658wgb.13 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=0O+T8ap5U/giTcKWMhGOG4QICbKT01bSf5JJEliBf2Q=; b=VN3g232VFAItsvDGBUv0pTiT7hnCseKO4VXe2U5Nff6DwrkyqTP0bSNJudFC4oQR2E CSeAPTOALZJ8Sf/RRDy+nfc/TbFkNRDjA56fz1HP9NbyxwHR/BFHwCEocvqeWTH5w2dM aoHwkeUUPt8fnnpy2PqSNribKPFWSoN6U8pzwg3CcvkXpjtwWgwRezXJ+XeqyNbRH72B kdvTw+4/zgUVkyCn72xD5tQy2bWNVXo8Ma1EJJqB+oYlZHaF6Jcr0RNfvi/AsW50W+vL W8tqgJL2485SjpcMaan8Dvtb5mfMQGKAuHXaw3+SWXtxW5QbfrrCYsGJJT4EIjtSSuk8 vYsA==
Received: by 10.180.97.106 with SMTP id dz10mr4818167wib.21.1348150998344; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from camionet.local (proformatique1-gw-std.alionis.net. [77.72.89.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm32859440wiw.7.2012.09.20.07.23.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <505B26D1.7070900@jitsi.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:23:13 +0200
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Organization: Jitsi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Miguel A. Garcia" <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
References: <505972DD.3060908@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <505972DD.3060908@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQZ3BspwoZhVZsb39wVVX4kuDc/E3ktJM7aH8rParY4ko4aNh4GjUV8cMckzEYF97iG51C
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and updates/corrections
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:23:26 -0000
+1 for B Although it might be tricky to classify some of the features you've listed above as either extensions or enhancements. ICE trickle would be one of those. Emil On 19.09.12, 09:23, Miguel A. Garcia wrote: > Hi all, > > This mail relates to ICE [RFC 5245]. > > In the past few months, we have seen a number of documents that are > trying to improve the usage of ICE in different ways. The list of > documents include at least the following drafts: > > - draft-keranen-mmusic-ice-address-selection-01 > - draft-petithuguenin-mmusic-ice-attributes-level-03 > - draft-wing-mmusic-ice-mobility-01 > - draft-elwell-mmusic-ice-updated-offer-02 > > There is, in addition, a long discussion in the RTCWEB mailing list > about "trickle ICE", and a couple of other ICE-related drafts > and discussions in RTCWEB. > > Most likely, we can categorize these documents in two big classes: > > a) Documents that identify underspecified areas or errors in the spec, > which are often driven by implementation experience > > b) Documents that update or extend ICE with new functionality, such as > "tricke ICE" (see e.g. the e-mail thread at > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg05121.html) . > Such documents may involve normative updates to the ICE specification or > they may simply be ICE extensions.". > > Assuming that we would get consensus to adopt some or all of these > documents as work to proceed on, the MMUSIC chairs and RAI ADs would > like to get some sense of how should we aim at documenting it. Below > are some options, please comment on them or add alternatives. > > a) Create a revision of ICE (i.e., a document what will obsolete RFC > 5245), including all the extensions and corrections that > we want to choose from the list. This sounds like a big effort in > time, and presumably will create a big spec. We should make sure that > people have enough cycles to devote to this activity. > > b) Create a revision of ICE (obsoleting RFC 5245), but only addressing > bug fixing and opening hooks to extensions, with the idea that > extensions won't need to violate 5245bis. Additionally, document each > extension in a separate RFC. Extensions will depend and refer to the > 5245bis draft. > > c) Leave the current ICE core spec as is. Document each extension > separately (referring to 5245). Create open or more documents listing > bug fixes and corrections (will also update RFC 5245). > > Needless to say, at this point in time, there is no decision as for > which of the ICE-related drafts will proceed or not. We are just > trying to get consensus of how to document ICE-related drafts, and in > particular if the WG believes we should do a revision of RFC 5245. If so, > we also need to hear who is willing to work on such a revision. > > Now, it is your time to express your opinion. > > Kindly regards, > > Flemming and Miguel. >
- [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and upda… Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Pal Martinsen (palmarti)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Emil Ivov
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Ari Keranen
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for path on ICE extensions and … Ari Keranen