IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] ICE updated offer

"Stach, Thomas" <thomas.stach@unify.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.stach@unify.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575881ACED4 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFXrvu1dvZ9E for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.unify.com (mx12.unify.com [62.134.46.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E9E1ACECB for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.235]) by mx12.unify.com (Server) with ESMTP id 5179A23F0434; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:17:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.241]) by MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.235]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:17:37 +0200
From: "Stach, Thomas" <thomas.stach@unify.com>
To: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>, 'Emil Ivov' <emcho@jitsi.org>, 'Iñaki Baz Castillo' <ibc@aliax.net>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] ICE updated offer
Thread-Index: AQHP6GJtuF9H8nwjukqj+Vm4R8Q5spwxLGYQgAAojICAAOuxkA==
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:17:36 +0000
Message-ID: <F81CEE99482EFE438DAE2A652361EE121E22CD91@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <CAD5OKxtqL=1ro_x-tMb7kcU1oTpv7SGSXNQAt4jW5hAVnT2hZQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D47D84C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfm6jMadLA11tCsP6gXhXCsdX1WzFanphGvO6kLEFvxSRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaJxBg_HfudWM9=0LFQgj-D=-pn6+UC1ev50LP_Hrf+87w@mail.gmail.com> <F81CEE99482EFE438DAE2A652361EE121E22C20B@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <004001cfe896$36205220$a260f660$@co.in>
In-Reply-To: <004001cfe896$36205220$a260f660$@co.in>
Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/V54g-Sghlo9a0ZIyStTSo1QMNJs
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, 'Roman Shpount' <roman@telurix.com>, 'Christer Holmberg' <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE updated offer
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:17:39 -0000

> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I'm not seeing that the second offer is relevant only to SIP. 
[TS] That is not what I said.
For background on my original statement you may want to refer to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosenberg-mmusic-ice-nonsip-01#section-5.4.2 

> Even in case
> WebRTC entity with (proprietary) signaling & media in the separate device,
> WebRTC signaling entity will not aware of the actual media IP, port &
> transport.
> 
> Thanks
> Partha
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mmusic [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stach,
> > Thomas
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 7:19 PM
> > To: Emil Ivov; Iñaki Baz Castillo
> > Cc: mmusic@ietf.org; Roman Shpount; Christer Holmberg
> > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE updated offer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I really don't think browsers have anything to do with this. It is
> > purely a matter of signalling. Nothing needs to be changed for webrtc
> > one way or another.
> > [TS] I agree. ICE updated offer was introduced to accommodate certain
> > SIP middleboxes. Its relevance outside of SIP is at least debatable.
> >
> > --sent from my mobile
> > On 15 Oct 2014 12:18 PM, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> > 2014-10-15 8:55 GMT+02:00 Christer Holmberg
> > <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>:
> > > What I suggest has very little impact on ICE as defined today. It
> > only adds
> > > some kind of indicator (ice-options attribute value?) whether the
> > second
> > > offer is needed or not. Simple :)
> >
> > And in case the SDP says that the "second offer" is required, then
> > what? I mean, should the browser do samething (I mean natively)? or is
> > it just up to the JS application?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Iñaki Baz Castillo
> > <ibc@aliax.net>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mmusic mailing list
> > mmusic@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> > _______________________________________________
> > mmusic mailing list
> > mmusic@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email