[MMUSIC] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-msrp-usage-data-channel-17

[Bo Burman <[e-mail]>]

WG, authors,



These are my shepherd's review comments:

1.      Please point more clearly to which IANA registries that are targeted in sections 9.1 and 9.3.
2.      In section 4.4, you are discussing dcsa use of setup, path, msrp-cema, accept-types, accept-wrapped-types, max-size, sendonly, recvonly, inactive, sendrecv, and "all the parameters related to MSRP file transfer" (section 4.7), but only setup has a corresponding IANA section (9.3), asking to register the attribute on dcsa level. Please add IANA information for all of the other specified attributes as well (as separate sections or extend section 9.3, as you see fit).
3.      In section 3.1 change sub-protocol value in the body text from "MSRP" to "msrp", for consistency.



Editorial comments/nits:

i)                    Consider aligning all occurrences of "a MSRP" to "an MSRP".



Idnits<https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/>:

a.      The document has no formal "updates" tag in the file header, it just mentions it in the abstract. Please use the formal title page header format, also for the provided XML.
b.      The abstract contains RFC4975 as a reference, which cannot be part of an abstract and must be replaced with a plain-text mention of that RFC.



Thanks,

Bo

MMUSIC co-chair