IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-12: the COMMENT

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Sun, 05 April 2020 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698653A091F; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 16:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QnOhQosCxHZY; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7CF13A091E; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 16:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id u2so397407iop.10; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=scpK55EfkpgrmLi/n2Sd48abTVTfaNRpFHPOHZPQrcg=; b=aM4cxGeMePo4Um/G9q5XtlqBt8ImOaA2Z8wJ5+6G46vV5fAAU2+juhpC4UNsOM6nHD TCkCDzrKu9LuTjzq2lbPDW/y239CKsd8hfSBZFiYD8G6Oe1JarLr+GNjN5xYrd2MGbEM ZMU6utTEUsgfimeS2ahO9hhZ7WFLtJciNiXTdE5OoZp5cCGInmIp1TzY184OsYR5IO4l qKNnd0HxxAEcGNy5EwIQitCh+XHrmRiWq+HUMLSZLJEhjOaue4K9EocPfCd2H6ZW6hZ0 JdjQaSafAhVIlnkq8mJxWywT+hkJtXd1maiXoE9YVEPdOjpCnIXGMl93KlJaIzRymkMb CiNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=scpK55EfkpgrmLi/n2Sd48abTVTfaNRpFHPOHZPQrcg=; b=iziWaVPUcWxCE5H6DO8/eqYlPS2Rc7p8scHtaIgQBG4azoH2t9Ny4r5g5v98ZsQrSX 0yQWh0CCic2UPbdlUnAx6UlFj0YFrIoFKGlshvzI2KhK9fZ17hOSuQ6rmKsPhLwDXlWI fZsXmYjv/F9Q/3LWqplN7cXyiLr4b7IYx8xBMwjb68vwWzevnb8Jpl/bRhcl430XmJ3p GBMPyKE3UXoR7pS8YRu2DCzEOuWIlXPj9PNz69dMZUPGk2/t47kFXedSGtZ/fA9otnlE C74fd81YQYnG1ydnrH+0CpfwGfsGGI7UA+eSAFx7PKqyofRQnjAHVvFVgQotdaa/xUP7 iAQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubJ1UEM6pGnDnYxVU1N1hgr5d4M31H4Z8ljM+UtJYOdm3fkRhyk fKVweKn1StTcaSW3qK2gt3/+iAwSCjr1rrEPE7i0oCefCfc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIk/MP+oAnEUdNuihrQazzODeIhjAjakPi24qJmA6ubhU4PC1uHuWsBoQ+sn8aK182lMbWP2NZQsY4VNnNWRcA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2e8c:: with SMTP id m12mr17564856iow.152.1586130879172; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A39BFD6F-64F7-4E23-8FC6-BC8C7B6F8C8F@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <A39BFD6F-64F7-4E23-8FC6-BC8C7B6F8C8F@ericsson.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:54:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxQ-6Z2yWA=bdyKjO=yjyJG08htm-bGRozyw5C1DjhTObQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel@ietf.org>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009ed35e05a293df37"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/YKq-tIK0vaoDvNZzO4fULtiZ_WM>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-12: the COMMENT
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 23:55:00 -0000

In Section 5.4, the endpoint "MUST NOT retransmit T140blocks" and "MUST NOT
insert missing text markers" unless "it has strong indications that a
T140block has been lost." The criterion is vague so I'm not sure how the
MUST is enforceable. I don't have an alternate proposal so I'll just ask if
there's a way to be more specific about 'strong indications.'



On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 11:57 AM Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank You for the review and comments!
>
> In this reply I try to address your COMMENT. I will provide my input on
> the DISCUSS in another repaly.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >    The Tsvarea review cites a few other places where the 2119 language
> is a little
> >    loose, e.g. MUSTs with vague and unenforceable criteria.
>
> We did sort out everything, and the outcome of the review is implemented
> in the current version (-12) of the draft.
>
> Is there something specific you still needs to be addressed?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email