Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Draft Agenda for IETF 86

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Thu, 28 February 2013 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4166621F87F3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:15:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QtZbskM31ffV for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com (mail-qe0-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F26F21F8746 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b4so966823qen.18 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:53:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dIrgeaJeaU6v93FUoBfONdq8ZTOimKmLIX478yv8v68=; b=cdng/vCB0v07XMNjOXjnop9Fctz5Lsox+VhUMDQi6LHjGsgKzZwwI+1Ymer6YNU+wH E/WW0BF0tsQKGwZweiKbL7hTLzng/yh7Cxa+Q++LVpwWlkfb/ASFj6XE80qCFW4e9tSK 8tsJJk5Ljp0ty5AQddgTWOVqSYHrQwVywHNF9Pwsy34POlV4YyZSlRYpuFz1OFhLpo35 gF6a39sh6pAmWgs0kg0fPzpXKp1LVweBcW9Rh/RObXCzPimhSWnuPSJwdZuN5rYgJXkg +lrPgYD0exVZkfKq1pRU/5uRR9iSvpbyEqRSRpZduXbNibivg0M+yPUETD7m49QtQksH OeSA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.27.136 with SMTP id i8mr11011325qac.63.1362009227526; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.24.130 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:53:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <512E6AEF.2050200@cisco.com>
References: <512E6AEF.2050200@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:53:47 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN5ODjWnpjwNW=eLUcrXEYhpFrj920KFoHdzdMez8yp8fA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Draft Agenda for IETF 86
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:16:00 -0000

I think it would be much clearer and more accurate if you would
separate out the documents under the "RTCWEB related drafts" into
those that are more general multi-stream related documents and those
that are RTCWEB specific - e.g., draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan-01 is
clearly an RTCWEB related draft. Whereas, many of the other drafts are
proposing solutions that might well be useful for other applications
such as CLUE.  I think it's really important that the MMUSIC WG keeps
in mind that RTCWEB requirements are not the only ones that need to be
considered in the context of the multi-stream work.

Thanks,
Mary

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> wrote:
> The MMUSIC draft agenda for IETF 86 has been posted at:
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/86/agenda/mmusic/
>
> Please take a look and let us know if you have any questions or comments.
>
> Thanks
>
>     Ari & Flemming
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic