Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Draft Agenda for IETF 86

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it would be much clearer and more accurate if you would
> separate out the documents under the "RTCWEB related drafts" into
> those that are more general multi-stream related documents and those
> that are RTCWEB specific - e.g., draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan-01 is
> clearly an RTCWEB related draft.

Actually, that document says this:

   "The requirements listed here are a collection of requirements that
   have come from WebRTC, CLUE, and the general community that uses RTP
   for interactive communications based on Offer/Answer."

So filename may not be the perfect indicator of author intent.

Ted

> Whereas, many of the other drafts are
> proposing solutions that might well be useful for other applications
> such as CLUE.  I think it's really important that the MMUSIC WG keeps
> in mind that RTCWEB requirements are not the only ones that need to be
> considered in the context of the multi-stream work.
>
> Thanks,
> Mary
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> wrote:
>> The MMUSIC draft agenda for IETF 86 has been posted at:
>>
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/86/agenda/mmusic/
>>
>> Please take a look and let us know if you have any questions or comments.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>     Ari & Flemming
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic