Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: explicit m-line for bundled session
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sat, 25 August 2012 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75B721F8496 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gzKWFIEmJt+D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F3121F8493 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146D739E12F; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:28:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yvI+ZR2L6Va3; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:27:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.11.193] (c-56fbe555.03-217-73746f1.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.229.251.86]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCA6C39E125; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:27:58 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5038E0EE.60608@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:27:58 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <CE457B53-341D-48C8-8CD7-2A0958407F37@vidyo.com> <50222D44.5040105@alvestrand.no> <BLU401-EAS1263CBF056291C5313CA95193CD0@phx.gbl>, <502258CA.5030009@alvestrand.no> <BLU002-W14079A44079EFA284B8E94793CC0@phx.gbl> <01C25C86-D664-468E-923F-4EEA506ACEDF@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <01C25C86-D664-468E-923F-4EEA506ACEDF@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: explicit m-line for bundled session
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:28:03 -0000
On 08/25/2012 03:41 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote: > On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:57 , Bernard Aboba wrote: > >> Harald said: >>> Bernard, since I'm so easily confused by how people transmit layers of >>> layered codecs, can you illustrate the particular scheme you want to >>> use, and can't think of how to represent in Jonathan's scheme? >> [BA] I am looking at RFC 5583 "Signaling Media Decoding Dependency in SDP". An >> example of how this would be used with H.264/SVC is included in RFC 6190, Section 7.3.4: >> >> a=group:DDP L1 L2 >> m=video 20000 RTP/AVP 96 >> a=rtpmap:96 H264/90000 >> a=fmtp:96 profile-level-id=4de00a; packetization-mode=0;mst-mode=NI-T; >> a=mid:L1 >> m=video 20002 RTP/AVP 97 >> a=rtpmap:97 H264-SVC/90000 >> a=fmtp:97 profile-level-id=53001F; packetization-mode=1; >> mst-mode=NI-TC; sprop-operation-point-info=<2,0,1,0,53000c, >> 3200,352,288,384,512>,<3,1,2,0,53001F,6400,704,576,768,1024>; >> a=mid:L2 >> a=depend:97 lay L1:96 >> >> >> Here the a=depend line is expressing the decoding dependency (layered in this case). >> >> Let us assume that there is also audio, as in Jonathan's example: >> >> m=audio 10000 RTP/AVP 0 8 97 >> a=mid:foo >> b=AS:200 >> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 >> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 >> a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000 >> >> >> Does the entire SDP offer with BUNDLE and dependency grouping look like this (ignoring RTP/RTCP mux for the moment)? >> >> v=0 >> o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 >> host.atlanta.com >> >> s= >> c=IN IP4 >> host.atlanta.com >> >> t=0 0 >> a=group:BUNDLE foo L1 L2 baz >> >> a=group:DDP L1 L2 >> m=audio 10000 RTP/AVP 0 8 98 >> a=mid:foo >> b=AS:200 >> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 >> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 >> a=rtpmap:98 iLBC/8000 >> a=candidate:1 1 UDP 1694498815 >> host.atlanta.com >> 10000 typ host >> m=video 20000 RTP/AVP 96 >> a=rtpmap:96 H264/90000 >> a=fmtp:96 profile-level-id=4de00a; packetization-mode=0;mst-mode=NI-T; >> a=mid:L1 >> m=video 20002 RTP/AVP 97 >> a=rtpmap:97 H264-SVC/90000 >> a=fmtp:97 profile-level-id=53001F; packetization-mode=1; >> mst-mode=NI-TC; sprop-operation-point-info=<2,0,1,0,53000c, >> 3200,352,288,384,512>,<3,1,2,0,53001F,6400,704,576,768,1024>; >> a=mid:L2 >> a=depend:97 lay L1:96 >> a=candidate:1 1 UDP 1694498815 >> host.atlanta.com >> 20002 typ host >> m=bundle 10000 RTP/AVP 0 8 96 97 98 >> a=mid:baz >> b=AS:1200 >> a=full-rtpmap:0 audio/PCMU/8000 >> a=full-rtpmap:8 audio/PCMA/8000 >> a=full-rtpmap:98 audio/iLBC/8000 >> a=full-rtpmap:96 H264/90000 >> a=full-rtpmap:97 H264-SVC/90000 >> a=depend:97 lay L1:96 >> a=candidate:1 1 UDP 1694498815 >> host.atlanta.com >> 10000 typ host >> >> >> > > I think it will work better if it just looked like > > v=0 > o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 host.atlanta.com > s= > c=IN IP4 host.atlanta.com > > t=0 0 > a=group:BUNDLE foo L1 L2 baz > > a=group:DDP L1 L2 > m=audio 10000 RTP/AVP 0 8 98 > a=mid:foo > b=AS:200 > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 > a=rtpmap:98 iLBC/8000 > a=candidate:1 1 UDP 1694498815 host.atlanta.com 10000 typ host > m=video 20000 RTP/AVP 96 > a=rtpmap:96 H264/90000 > a=fmtp:96 profile-level-id=4de00a; packetization-mode=0;mst-mode=NI-T; > a=mid:L1 > m=video 20002 RTP/AVP 97 > a=rtpmap:97 H264-SVC/90000 > a=fmtp:97 profile-level-id=53001F; packetization-mode=1; > mst-mode=NI-TC; sprop-operation-point-info=<2,0,1,0,53000c, > 3200,352,288,384,512>,<3,1,2,0,53001F,6400,704,576,768,1024>; > a=mid:L2 > a=depend:97 lay L1:96 > a=candidate:1 1 UDP 1694498815 host.atlanta.com 20002 typ host > > > that seems to have all the same information as the version with m=bundle thing and AFAIC some firewalls are going to remove all the stuff under the m=bundle line as it is not a recognized media type. Not taking a position, but having firewalls remove all the m=bundle stuff (and presumably also the a=group:BUNDLE line) is, in my view, actually an advantage of this approach. (If the firewall removes the m=bundle and not the a=group:BUNDLE, we're left with a somewhat strange SDP.) Cullen, I note you're using different port numbers on the m= sections. Are you assuming the semantics from a=group:TOGETHER - that one picks the first one?
- [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: expl… Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Lishitao
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Lishitao
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Parthasarathi R
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Parthasarathi R
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Parthasarathi R
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Possible BUNDLE alternative syntax: … Christer Holmberg