Re: [MMUSIC] comments on draft-even-mmusic-application-token-01

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0225711E81B3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.116
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.116 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Ga75ehED1CG for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x231.google.com (mail-ea0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A30E11E8176 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f15so238111eak.36 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=yZLCRWM7NcfMnpV7BoMU8d56PjJWqpNRJknnEc4Qcr8=; b=vWB5uXtx4PFUHvmkCqwuMXeGUsJhtwK/+lRmX9iRyJ/HptZX3DigvahITvvF5WuYx7 wxuNKizbEbe3rJV4CK1/NjQkd2bnxWL9ygr861iIEEvVnGFw8ftSWetZ5YLlM7kCX3fI lh9uO2b/P2nNWoO+vw3zyr3DqvGsUsJiVAq6vyfPUl2ToljK8zNiRH5nynzWzLm9i98E GAlZbMaSftgMHLlaCyGb8eI3hkavRxO6138yDh6wXfiPYFeGB3BMJ1aHSp+BNMGI48W+ Knua44+wzkjTGbIa3/1RygTxP8VWEOhZkAtAUE87cJDAPATjZvQBCRZz7IXx9mLljPVk Wzxg==
X-Received: by 10.14.203.198 with SMTP id f46mr1592180eeo.111.1383085623365; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE (bzq-79-181-191-27.red.bezeqint.net. [79.181.191.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f49sm75544223eec.7.2013.10.29.15.27.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Paul Kyzivat' <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, 'Martin Thomson' <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <526D5CDD.40805@alum.mit.edu> <CABkgnnVekG9bDbO7mvNPcKHH1w3JmvKTcT2K=D1-ERW-vr2GLA@mail.gmail.com> <526D8FA3.1030503@alum.mit.edu> <CABkgnnXTYCx8uWZPUq7KgGdSr1w64kq_SCTDVP56p5DEjaYj3g@mail.gmail.com> <019f01ced3ed$f83e1090$e8ba31b0$@gmail.com> <CABkgnnVFkay_iM2_O9xdfm8ZVxgKX3Etk272Hv0VTKhTEZCYng@mail.gmail.com> <023801ced464$91e97f60$b5bc7e20$@gmail.com> <526FD5E0.6010202@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <526FD5E0.6010202@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:23:49 +0200
Message-ID: <032e01ced4f5$8cfab640$a6f022c0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJ6iXv0c6W9apn1bzhH/0GpTiVp7gIEvfvRAp4w7t8B8NJj/gJe/nO0Al9VIzsCUToXgQLiKcF3mDCrKAA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] comments on draft-even-mmusic-application-token-01
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:27:05 -0000

Paul,
Inline
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: 29 October, 2013 5:36 PM
> To: Roni Even; 'Martin Thomson'
> Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] comments on draft-even-mmusic-application-token-01
> 
> Roni,
> 
> I'm still not sure I understand. I'm going to repeat my characterization about
> what I understand one more time:
> 
> - an RTP session MAY have one or more appid tokens
[Roni Even] This is correct but not important, an m-line can have one or more appIds toke
> - at any point in time each appid token maps to at most
>    one stream (SSRC) within the session.
[Roni Even] To one media stream - see the taxonomy draft
> - *new* appid:ssrc mappings MAY be initialized via SDP
[Roni Even] Yes
> - new appid:ssrc mappings MAY be initialized via receipt
>    of the new RTPC SDES message or header extension
[Roni Even] This is not a may but that is the MUST and we need both SDES and RTP header but the RTP header should have precedence in case of race condition. This is to allow the binding between a media stream in SDP to an SSRC to happen in the RTP when it is used.

> - existing appid:ssrc mappings MAY be updated via
>    receipt of the new RTCP SDES message or header extension.
[Roni Even] Yes, RTP header has precedence over SDES in case of race condition.
> 
> Can you either confirm the above is correct, or else update it so it is correct?
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> 
> 
> On 10/29/13 1:06 AM, Roni Even wrote:
> > Martin,
> > 1. My understanding that unified is only applicable to RTCweb but not a
> general MMUSIC solution. A singe media stream per m-line that may be
> grouped  is also a case for MMUSIC.
> > 2. The motivation for appID is also having multiple media streams (each with
> a different SSRC) in a single m-line representing a media source. (unified).
> > 3. The FEC example is more a corner case and a question I had about
> > msid and unified but not the motivation for appID Roni
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: 28 October, 2013 7:17 PM
> >> To: Roni Even
> >> Cc: Paul Kyzivat; mmusic@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] comments on
> >> draft-even-mmusic-application-token-01
> >>
> >> On 28 October 2013 07:57, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> there can be an m-line for RTP stream
> >>
> >> I have
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00#section
> >> -
> >> 3.3
> >> bookmarked, strangely enough, and the third paragraph is fairly clear
> >> about the desired configuration, which is that multiple SSRCs are
> >> grouped into the same m-line.
> >>
> >> The issues regarding the use of a single FEC repair stream for
> >> multiple sources is where the "can" part comes in, but I wouldn't
> >> have used that as the starting position for this appid work.
> >
> >