Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Considerations) in draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06
Justin Uberti <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com> Tue, 23 November 2021 00:37 UTC
Return-Path: <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643E03A0BB0 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:37:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=alphaexplorationco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JgSVZvaAL2jC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:37:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF383A0B90 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id n17-20020a9d64d1000000b00579cf677301so297608otl.8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:37:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alphaexplorationco.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1BfhrPF91YnLxDbaE+X6GJ/hZoL+H/KiNoDXP5jN9/Q=; b=fR6NFyEiBMJwkCqLXPgl4CcY5ibugRdI5GCuPDWYnwZNChuwedABEI/cYFhdT0/F83 Hb2MAX89ny2ukcsQowrgWwsjNdFClT/gBOykPHnmaPhPmKYNLDlL4Mm+CPGybobOsSZz HWvWHUWAeGeFQdJGJK2HtmZhd/rSYkVwKA2abl3uy2uugFj/rMuqmADUX1XFf7RY2WhH 17PCN7U63L7/AChOmKsGvk/waJPWqVQB1NwK6QSPbVhBkysE78Fem7Ao72SWhJmTwAuC JnJ4WTN20Z6LWfSl01fgTs7SOiGFI2zHTJj+6ZhCOukTDwJzoH88B6wllNSJYGpO2FoQ vVHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1BfhrPF91YnLxDbaE+X6GJ/hZoL+H/KiNoDXP5jN9/Q=; b=BnxutfA4qEYZuw1H4ukRAsntFbFPeUByOu5VlagXQeT8pC6yL0YuFAN6rfm+coV0Wn 9BYzoBF+ENWtA6KXnM+pwXmMaK/HdI/q+6ep1JZkmQMTxdfcHidEyPN7l3PZv5oxRUTc 57epn3Hwvi+ZKq+DkiL4Nxw3g/kADOTc1AQfeD0GrjT9BWiYBwRuysWBVxr9TrbFZeDc 2kBzLO15H6tWthpC4ZYhhOxYZDvmUAMeWkXXZ/WO3J1Kq5q//wXmybMfNgjhxJZibmYW l7juFd8vl1t5/83Q+sYqKPjFpyjre96+u062fBkLB1Vf/maJ+RqBfIlsq3+Lm14mJmVM ZOKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ahUMpgyd4V9lWRdiLGnzgBiq0M38wLfRBj9l32PwMfmVDgdsz GXLlisq/QOlflFO5FHcMdXr3F5sfG+JZwRELSIx4Tw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTl4cPBhZzF+U4wj6rC3gU01S807Kaafj42Jgi1SQhCNT6H+wS6mEU9y9FvQxDU4CJwjqGGPIfr1xTHcr6ZMI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7758:: with SMTP id t24mr540248otl.264.1637627845505; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:37:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <443b55f8-9d42-6728-de87-36a8392aaa10@cisco.com> <CAOLzse3aNuKCp9jSXyzAdLjpaCZUzL4K071k3zLTWoE3Fry-BA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB4441163C03DA3FA9A88B0114939F9@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB4441163C03DA3FA9A88B0114939F9@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:37:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOLzse1JMd=re=96OQR1qD6wj_SJnwRdUGAzU69k4v=gr4LcvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000018e5105d169f23a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/mjkDM4A5s7CuiNOnrg3yZyxH0ho>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Considerations) in draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:37:33 -0000
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:22 AM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > >I have reviewed the changes between -05 and -06 and have the following > comments: > > > >1) for some reason, "offer" has been replaced with "Offer" throughout the > document. This is a minor nit, but seems incorrect to me. > > I did that, because in the previous version we already used "BUNDLE > Offer", so I thought I'd do it to be consistent. > The problem though is that "answer" still is in lowercase so that introduces its own inconsistency. Generally I think we should avoid capitalization of common words to avoid confusion. > > >2) The first two paragraphs of 7.6 say similar things and it's not clear > to me why they both exist. Here is my suggested revision: > > The first paragraph is more general, while the second paragraph describes > how it is realized in SIP. > > Understood, but I feel like that intent was not totally clear in the current text. > Regards, > > Christer > > > > > > OLD: > > In some 3rd Party Call Control (3PCC) scenarios a new session will be > established between an endpoint that is currently part of an ongoing > session and an endpoint that is currently not part of an ongoing > session. The endpoint that is part of a session will generate a > subsequent SDP Offer that will be forwarded to the other endpoint by > a 3PCC controller. The endpoint that is not part of a session will > process the Offer as an initial SDP Offer. > > The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [RFC3261 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3261>] allows a User Agent > Client (UAC) to send a re-INVITE request without an SDP body > (sometimes referred to as an empty re-INVITE). In such cases, the > User Agent Server (UAS) will include an SDP Offer in the associated > 200 (OK) response. If the UAS is a part of an ongoing SIP session, > it will include a subsequent offer in the 200 (OK) response. The > offer will be received by a 3PCC controller (UAC) and then forwarded > to another User Agent (UA). If the UA is not part of an ongoing SIP > session, it will process the offer as an initial SDP Offer. > > > NEW: > > > In some 3rd Party Call Control (3PCC) scenarios a new session will be > > established between an endpoint that is currently part of an ongoing > session and an endpoint that is not currently part of an ongoing > session. In this situation the endpoint that is not part of a session > > can receive SDP with subsequent offer semantics in an initial > > SDP Offer, as described below. > > The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [RFC3261 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3261>] allows a User Agent > Client (UAC) to send a re-INVITE request without an SDP body (sometimes > referred to as an empty re-INVITE). In such cases, the User Agent Server > (UAS) will include an SDP offer in the associated 200 (OK) response, and > when the UAS is a part of an ongoing SIP session, this offer will be a > subsequent offer. This offer will be received > > by the 3PCC controller (UAC) and then forwarded to another User Agent (UA). > When that UA is not part of an ongoing SIP session, as noted above, > > it will process the offer as an initial SDP Offer. > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 3:16 PM Flemming Andreasen <fandreas= > 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Greetings MMUSIC > > We previously submitted draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis for publication, > however subsequently, the issue of 3rd Party Call Control came up and as a > result of that, Section 7.6 has been updated accordingly. > > We are hereby starting a 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 only in > draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06. > > If you have any comments on Section 7.6, please send those to the document > authors and the MMUSIC mailing list by Wednesday November 24, 2021. If you > review it but do not have any comments, please send a note to that effect > as well. > > Thanks > > -- Flemming (MMUSIC co-chair) > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > >
- [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Conside… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Keith Drage
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg