Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing - Payload Type Analysis
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 30 June 2014 11:26 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210381A020A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.85
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_18=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_19=0.6, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5NyUuFk_oqrp for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F401A020B for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCAE7C3949 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:26:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EH83iF8foVnu for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:26:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-hippo.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:1043:1:7646:a0ff:fe90:e2bb]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 268E27C38EA for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:26:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53B14959.2090907@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:26:17 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <CAMRcRGRwxx=Z_pQN33CuU5+=EdB2oBn+xC5hf4J4YYtixE2vgA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRcRGRwxx=Z_pQN33CuU5+=EdB2oBn+xC5hf4J4YYtixE2vgA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030409080108070500090106"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/uu8G_SKNZhswoXgCrJxJNVWPL3U
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing - Payload Type Analysis
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:26:26 -0000
I agree with Bo's analysis concluding that IDENTICAL-PER-SSRC is likely not needed, and that situations where one has one SSRC in multiple media descriptions are probably a Bad Thing (I can't think of a case where it would represent anything but a bug). IDENTICAL-PER-PT seems like a sensible thing to add. On 06/23/2014 05:36 AM, Suhas Nandakumar wrote: > Hello All > > Continuing the discussions from London on analyzing multiplexing > behavior for SDP attributes that are defined per Payload Type, I was > thinking on making following changes to the > draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01. > > 1. Add new category called IDENTICAL-PER-PT to the SDP Attribute > analysis framework in Section 4 which is defined as > > IDENTICAL-PER-PT: Attributes that define the RTP payload configuration > on per Payload Type basis and MUST have identical values across all > the media descriptions for a given RTP Payload Type when repeated. > > 2. Similarly add another category IDENTICAL-PER-SSRC to accommodate > source level SDP attributes. > > IDENTICAL-PER-SSRC: Attributes that correspond to the individual RTP > Packet Streams in a given RTP Session and MUST have identical values > when repeated across multiple media description for a given SSRC. > > 3. For all the attributes that directly/indirectly impact codec > configuration and packetization of the media, I have attempted to > assign a SDP MUX category and provide some insights on how such a > decision was made (wherever applicable) > > *Attribute: a=ptime, a=maxptime* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > Notes: For a given codec the audio packetization time must be same if > the PT is repeated. This will ensure that the RTP receiver > can unambiguously decode the incoming audio packets. > > > *Attribute: a=framerate* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > > *Attribute: a=rtpmap* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > > > *Attribute: a=fmtp* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > Notes: > > *Attribute: a=rtcp-fb* > Mux Category: NORMAL > Notes: Since the feedback messages are reported per SSRC, the category > of NORMAL suffices. > > *Attribute: a=depend (RFC5583)* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > Notes: > Since each dependency identifies a unique RTP packetization and thus > MUST be identified via unique Payload Type. > Similarly if the Payload Type is repeated across media descriptions, > they MUST represent the Identical codec configuration. > > *Attribute: a=ssrc:xyz fmtp:<fmt> ... * > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > Notes: > RFC5576 says this : > " > Within a media stream, "ssrc" attributes with the same value of > <ssrc-id> describe different attributes of the same media sources. > Across media streams, <ssrc-id> values are not correlated (unless > correlation is indicated by media-stream grouping or some other > mechanism) and MAY be repeated. > " > Thus if the RTP Payload Type used to specify fmtp parameters is repeated, it MUST representthe same codec configuration. > example: > m=video ... > a=rtpmap:98 VP8/90000 > a=ssrc:12345 fmtp:98max-fr=15; max-fs-1200 > m=video ... > a=rtpmap:98 VP8/90000 > > a=ssrc:56789 fmtp:98 max-fr=15; max-fs-1200 > *Attribute: a=ssrc:xyz cname: ....* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-SSRC > Notes: RFC5576 defines the identical requirement as it is. > > * > * > *Attribute: a=imageattr* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > > > *Attribute: a=framesize* > Mux Category: IDENTICAL-PER-PT > > > *Attributes: a=fec-source-flow, a=fec-repair-flow, a=repair-window* > Mux Category: NORMAL > > > I believe these cover all PT scoped SDP attributes. Please let me know > your thoughts and comments. > > Cheers > Suhas Nandakumar > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
- [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing - Pa… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing … Bo Burman
- Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing … Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing … Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing … Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [MMUSIC] ISSUE1: SDP Attributes Multiplexing … Harald Alvestrand