Re: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

Section 8 consists solely of section 8.1. The 8.1 is redundant.

Section 10 looks a little weird, because it has the section numbering 
for the updated documents mixed in with the section numbering of this 
document. I'm not sure of long term plans. Is this stuff to eventually 
be removed once everyone agrees on what is to be done? Or is it to 
remain? If it is going to be removed, then what you have is fine. If it 
is going to stay, then I think something needs to be done to make the 
presentation less confusing. (E.g., indent it and/or move into an appendix.)

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 12/8/15 2:48 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new version (-02) of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-02 has been submitted.
>
> Note that this version now suggests updates to RFC 5763 (SRTP-DTLS) and
> RFC 7341 (UDPTL-DTLS), so I encourage people to take a look.
>
> In addition, there is some new text about re-using connection-oriented
> (read: acknowledged packet delivery) for establishing a new DTLS
> association.
>
> You can also find the document on github:
> https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-dtls-sdp
>
> (NOTE: This is my personal repo, as I am not aware of any “official”
> MMUSIC repo)
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>