Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] Request to progress I-D draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions to RFC editor

Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com> Sat, 25 April 2009 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mobopts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mobopts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E7B3A63EC for <mobopts@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JR3uisyY75s3 for <mobopts@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f221.google.com (mail-gx0-f221.google.com [209.85.217.221]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDAB3A6AFF for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so3933764gxk.7 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=R8/oSbEn/hGMPU8jFxs/4fJxgdapcMOxm2sZ1U6lP9s=; b=Ya1nEwVW3iLe3dM4wNfS/L73G1EOZiXDW0IOYqlzYcYSInS+Oc8157VgM71jzhRXhI edcMIhLmNxSi6tXUDgaUrDHJJXSm2pH+S4A48butomowh9H8Es6HWOSUvl+knwBGXAP2 67M6VILpnD/jRFXgO8yL/NMkOCrw05Bcj5pmg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JN1zWGSGMuJHnF9MTHU+xJVwO45NDaopk0RM5uxWPHCrV/8KtHaAQ7ZfHRJ2LEWbmE gCZG2fkrHXKRQqN/j47VmeAsriJdE3C+YtcCcxd+78Zkagc0otU287kOzpLJF3x1V3CT 7l3zZXN/BzxEHdf84rJr5zOOx2YH46ddIOdQI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.88.16 with SMTP id l16mr3440208agb.91.1240625366634; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49EDCB47.2060607@isi.edu>
References: <C6124431.26C6C%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> <49EDCB47.2060607@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:09:26 -0700
Message-ID: <3d57679a0904241909l6dc4e370r75c4154df48717ef@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <falk@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: irsg@isi.edu, mobopts@irtf.org, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] Request to progress I-D draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions to RFC editor
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/mobopts>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:08:09 -0000

Hi Aaron,

author's perspective: We did respond to all the comments and there was
subsequent response which indicated that the ID is ready for
publication.

A couple of typos were caught which can be fixed in RFC editor's review.

Thanks,

-Rajeev


On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Aaron Falk <falk@isi.edu> wrote:
> Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The IRSG poll for I-D: draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions has
>> been completed. Other than a few nits which can be addressed as part of the
>> RFC-editor process, there were no objections to publishing the document.
>>
>> The conclusion is that the I-D is ready for publication.
>>
>> In my role as the shepherd for this I-D, I recommend progressing this I-D to
>> the RFC editor for publication.
>>
>> -Basavaraj
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Hi Basavaraj-
>
> It doesn't look like the draft has been revised to respond to the
> comments from the IRSG review.  Wes Eddy and Stephen Farrell sent
> substantive but non-blocking comments.  Please respond to those that
> before requesting publication.  (The RFC Editor's 'Authors 48 Hours
> review' isn't intended to do another editing pass but to fix editorial
> issues that come up during RFC preparation.)
>
> When that's done, I'd like to ask that you prepare a 'request to
> publish' message that has a little more about the review history of the
> document.  I'm attaching a message from another doc so you can see
> what's expected.
>
> Let me know if you have questions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --aaron
>
>> Aaron: This is a request to publish the ICCRG's document
>> draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs-06 as an Informational RFC.
>>
>> The draft has been revised based on a number of reviews,
>> and the latest version incorporates editorial marks that
>> were submitted by Stephen Farrell and Juergen Shoenwaelder
>> during IRSG Review / Poll, where 2 "Ready to Publish" votes
>> were received, and none otherwise.  Prior to this, the
>> document has been reviewed and modified based on other IRSG
>> member reviews (Sally Floyd and Mark Allman) during the
>> ICCRG process.
>>
>> During the ICCRG's development of the document, specific
>> public reviews that changes were incorporated from were
>> submitted on the ICCRG list by:
>>
>> - Rex Buddenberg
>> - Mitchell Erblichs
>> - Lachlan Andrew
>> - Sally Floyd
>> - Gorry Fairhurst
>> - Lars Eggert
>> - Mark Allman
>>
>> The issue tracker entry includes the versions of the
>> draft since IRSG review started, and the reviews from
>> Juergen and Stephen:
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/25
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobopts mailing list
> Mobopts@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
>