Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] Request to progress I-D draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions to RFC editor

Aaron Falk <falk@isi.edu> Tue, 21 April 2009 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <falk@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: mobopts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mobopts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C563A697E for <mobopts@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.399, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZu1MDZX67VU for <mobopts@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.bbn.com (mx3.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6481628C1FD for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp89-081-010.bbn.com ([128.89.81.10]) by mx3.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <falk@isi.edu>) id 1LwG6p-0008IY-Ai; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:33:59 -0400
Message-ID: <49EDCB47.2060607@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:33:59 -0400
From: Aaron Falk <falk@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
References: <C6124431.26C6C%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6124431.26C6C%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:04:08 -0700
Cc: irsg@ISI.EDU, mobopts@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] Request to progress I-D draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions to RFC editor
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/mobopts>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:32:50 -0000

Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The IRSG poll for I-D: draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions has
> been completed. Other than a few nits which can be addressed as part of the
> RFC-editor process, there were no objections to publishing the document.
>
> The conclusion is that the I-D is ready for publication.
>
> In my role as the shepherd for this I-D, I recommend progressing this I-D to
> the RFC editor for publication.
>
> -Basavaraj
>
>
>   


Hi Basavaraj-

It doesn't look like the draft has been revised to respond to the
comments from the IRSG review.  Wes Eddy and Stephen Farrell sent
substantive but non-blocking comments.  Please respond to those that
before requesting publication.  (The RFC Editor's 'Authors 48 Hours
review' isn't intended to do another editing pass but to fix editorial
issues that come up during RFC preparation.) 

When that's done, I'd like to ask that you prepare a 'request to
publish' message that has a little more about the review history of the
document.  I'm attaching a message from another doc so you can see
what's expected.

Let me know if you have questions.

Thanks,

--aaron

> Aaron: This is a request to publish the ICCRG's document
> draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs-06 as an Informational RFC.
>
> The draft has been revised based on a number of reviews,
> and the latest version incorporates editorial marks that
> were submitted by Stephen Farrell and Juergen Shoenwaelder
> during IRSG Review / Poll, where 2 "Ready to Publish" votes
> were received, and none otherwise.  Prior to this, the
> document has been reviewed and modified based on other IRSG
> member reviews (Sally Floyd and Mark Allman) during the
> ICCRG process.
>
> During the ICCRG's development of the document, specific
> public reviews that changes were incorporated from were
> submitted on the ICCRG list by:
>
> - Rex Buddenberg
> - Mitchell Erblichs
> - Lachlan Andrew
> - Sally Floyd
> - Gorry Fairhurst
> - Lars Eggert
> - Mark Allman
>
> The issue tracker entry includes the versions of the
> draft since IRSG review started, and the reviews from
> Juergen and Stephen:
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/25
>
>