Re: [Mops] TreeDN Shepherd Review

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Tue, 20 February 2024 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F0EC180B40 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:55:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HqBrcy-Z58zM for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:55:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F87C1519A9 for <mops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-563c595f968so6861568a12.0 for <mops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:55:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; t=1708448129; x=1709052929; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4pz9oAWW4s0WtwNfdLSI11rIZ1mEwOSC8l15tPeizaY=; b=aK/k9xZys/Za1zbx+gLYIKlv2TxaWrc1LK15/rgpu4JSJPNiF7ZTkeeavgtTeH96uB ymEWTAoM47ERyRn3AWjKFQjebhmtK2Trs/c6WYYe/vCd7gZWvvZnIs4xjQdYiOkNPmeH 3cYNxBXKF38rL47Ov53wcPFwfJzFP8zVULVv4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708448129; x=1709052929; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4pz9oAWW4s0WtwNfdLSI11rIZ1mEwOSC8l15tPeizaY=; b=pw53Ana2Vdj9JJHh/zdORcP0t/y3bQ91t9V6h8WL4P3X5y1xJSKlBPYCAi1iaimzMD 8w2DwcxzBIAjV8UfWR/Op52MUM0rpqeByJHd8j3Ihr7TrjoOPPPd/41h6FJdWGHOgiug /PTbdJOJPqZjg/h1k4ELx/iDoYpuin2XOmNvpP3Mes9i1LtsKrCLWPu2xlcvLtb8b5GX 7u1MeImFooCsp686Ue+KDW7Z7qY6vgENVXluXw+uEISJLfZr798CarI+QVu3DzjV4NRV fU5kiSojikI/3y6vtmpph3TNmx5esdS0vgCPhJmm+EQojYerMGA0ijTBm0dqx7+RXJSf EAUQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWuGIbos1JKZAnwyHl3XafrcnI69DZ2WSW3hbO8Pw88TzVUzvMy+bSfNNJbzxIPVCIieZ1B+Z3FM6D94Snd
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx8nBV+snX7gqRJBsiPRNHveiq3fBITxPjk0kHeSkMQzabsVA3O JKUzYOYBG7FrMbRuCy6yMymjo0REIM3aIZEfR2kTE9OUrHmEte7AwFU39wmjBr81L2ToNPMC2Nb 6eeXRkDpL5WU5ENvBZXnKWBcXyef394b8uOv4IA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFqIgcASKVN6N/xrc4RrpZPiEEJZYvKJoSsFrf7lJk3BhkI4NBksdvkvl5YyJNlYPawUVK9vN/ufVoj7OChdp0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4757:b0:a3e:7e1f:44a3 with SMTP id j23-20020a170906475700b00a3e7e1f44a3mr3975932ejs.11.1708448129049; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:55:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJEGKNvmhE3UmGbWTKScnOwjCMT_FfuMhPG_E1qQjZUxVNSjDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJEGKNupLDcJiXK_DX0S9M5MwwA8iDOv4NgU_JG63zWcA4vXMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJU8_nWYfSdTLGOu2hnYjbjNs6Ld7H=1yqSU-1CcSzJFBGo03w@mail.gmail.com> <6e6d1947-b363-3b43-c0ae-758d93ef81b2@juniper.net> <CAJEGKNtTpat54v2daw=dh2QKum+4vCUOUj4pR-XmrG-7-7LNgw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJEGKNtTpat54v2daw=dh2QKum+4vCUOUj4pR-XmrG-7-7LNgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:55:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nWQM5YZA-nCakzp2RvO4btwvHbdcQjNLTT4qb6EeuGFeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com>
Cc: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>, draft-ietf-mops-treedn.authors@ietf.org, mops@ietf.org, Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "Lenart, Christopher (Chris)" <chris.lenart@verizon.com>, Rich Adam <richard.adam@geant.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d979bf0611d31318"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/KcWuSIWfw5P_6yWfRtp_0jv7NP8>
Subject: Re: [Mops] TreeDN Shepherd Review
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:55:35 -0000

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:48 AM Chris Lemmons <alficles@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> @kyle: I wasn't entirely certain whether I should add my full writeup
> to the datatracker before or after giving the authors a chance to make
> the minor updates. It felt weird to add it with the nits when I
> suspected the authors would want to fix at least some subset of them
> before sending it for additional review. Let me know what works best
> for streamlining things.
>

I don't have a strong opinion either way. I'm happy to let the authors
choose what to resolve now vs. later. Once you and the authors are both
happy with the report, submit it and I'll get the ball rolling on
publication.

Thanks,
Kyle