IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mops] Low latency protocol comparision

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Wed, 24 June 2020 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146963A11BD for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4te7zzJQP7qQ for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa36.google.com (mail-vk1-xa36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7190C3A11BC for <mops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa36.google.com with SMTP id d64so938755vke.4 for <mops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3ybtcujhPqgm8zHPKv9xrcQeggPJMuhczP99wJQW9sU=; b=dh1Q6MTo3XdHuL8UVHsiIADe5Yn08VMSpa7E25vse+i7UORTTSO1pJNuUbr74hvf72 6EL2adB7Sua9lJ4WbtHWLu+JsNF5DlX7d8royNkd4DPI1Q6KW+U23yZJVBNvSrQMrBoY rj65JB6wMwWWkPlSkX+y0O5NN3/QDaXOHMiIU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3ybtcujhPqgm8zHPKv9xrcQeggPJMuhczP99wJQW9sU=; b=Su/2OnR4uDpTAbxcd+2YtFGrEhQinBA3FktbuI3DgYq/c3dLRCJWH8NCUhDmPmRE0E 7820jVMdP1banvIocFYKybc0uDcqzyvTiQrriqJHDdE3c4Glqz0kh2anWaqAAR/J1QNz GZJM6V0I7yAQrwyThrj4+gJQzGrtO6yCvFu+wXSFBQllbIIXDfSlr6eP2dr1BCYtmlUE 5+8dWbs7O+XYEimUAk7kCvZJ8SLZa0o+T5h7YAY64Nnl9zmwJ3n5vfK340jMia5kUMT7 On6fVutQ/iuqAWOfGmELtcgVQD41Mpyll0fgMitnrj0Hk5WRfQFU302GGJIPW/tsc8/U chyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333H/1tFblF+0eFSHCnzjkXwG8dxWgX4OjMg3gDzmpWZ22vmHzq 3JlrSMgTLiKBYysCMPDx9+NeTVX4j0APRCoYjCbcog==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyf3lxDzEJiiB7PwWVJFciZoNPniuFuNfnZeERpUQd/V0qiQ5Q5FyOKyX3S8IlqWrkGVCRJfQnrBlDdCUSiaWM=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:4185:: with SMTP id o127mr24489553vka.45.1593038271268; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHgZEq4iQx0Un2N_rSOPafDCqzWxO_y_dX3JzZ=nw3=hbhinRQ@mail.gmail.com> <17635DFD-B536-4B22-8A5D-314BCBEFF19C@nbcuni.com> <CAHgZEq738OMiXwsuDuz22zR2tsF+hX8gUNgFsq1262F9rYJcvg@mail.gmail.com> <7D14F27F-5914-46EC-9E27-9A61D3CEF820@haivision.com> <CAHgZEq7W6eXNvD246veeDZVODh123o+q=rghXtPauXWOf+jzLw@mail.gmail.com> <CF90C2E6-3FB0-4FDC-B46E-B4688B5423B0@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF90C2E6-3FB0-4FDC-B46E-B4688B5423B0@thinkingcat.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:37:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nXEv=ezu=25oCs_=rCKyHpJuDk2cFFLCb7m_X0=G8oKng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
Cc: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>, "Deen, Glenn" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>, mops@ietf.org, Maxim Sharabayko <maxsharabayko@haivision.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045db9c05a8dc2009"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/QFvR9J4InjC_pyIUp-CXLTpX86o>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Low latency protocol comparision
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:37:54 -0000

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:16 PM Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Speaking as only one of the chairs of this group, I have to say I like how
> this is shaping up.
>
> My only question is whether there is work to be done even at the IETF 108
> hackathon, in order to establish the test cases and test suite?
>
> Happy to hear from the other co-chair of this group :^) and any other
> group participants.
>

Heh...  As the other co-chair, Leslie and I are in alignment on this. If
there's prep work to be done at the 108 hackathon, great! If not, BKK (or,
likely, the virtual replacement for it) sounds like a plan. Even if we
don't do anything at the 108 hackathon, there's probably a bit of prep
we'll want to do prior to the 109 hackathon, including coordinating with
Charles on any special network setup we might need should the meeting be
held in person.

Kyle

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email