Re: [Moq] Agenda topics for side meeting on Tuesday

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

So, three things I should say before the Tuesday side meeting.

First - this side meeting will be under Notewell, because it's focused on
input to the IETF.

Second - I'm planning to record the session, just so I can verify what we
said, so that I can produce decent minutes. If anyone objects, please also
volunteer to take excellent notes!

Third - James and I are most familiar with the RTP over QUIC proposals, but
we recognize that there will be commonalities between various proposals,
so  we're perfectly happy to talk about other use cases and requirement
sets. So, letting us know what you're thinking about, as requested below,
will be super useful.

Please Do The Right Thing.

Best,

Spencer

On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 12:36 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear MOQ fans,
>
> It's time to put together an agenda for the Tuesday meeting. I'd like for
> this meeting to be a working session, not a forum for presentations, so
> please keep that in mind.
>
> As a high-order bit, I think we've spent a lot of time thinking about use
> cases here, and I'd like to push down another level, and make sure we
> understand what the work for the IETF (and possibly for the IRTF) is.
>
> I know what the protocol work is for my use cases:
>
>    - Mapping RTP onto QUIC (many options exist, so picking one or more
>    would be helpful) This is squarely in scope for AVTCORE
>    - Mapping RTCP onto QUIC (which may be the same approach as used for
>    RTP, or may include things like using QUIC facilities instead of RTCP
>    facilities, where those QUIC facilities exist).. Again, this is squarely in
>    scope for AVTCORE
>    - SDP description for RTP/RTCP over QUIC. This is squarely in scope
>    for MMUSIC, as soon as we figure out the details in AVTCORE.
>
> What is the IETF/IRTF work for your use cases?
>