Re: [mpls] Closed: Poll to see if we have support to make draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return an mpls working group document

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 29 July 2014 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1151B2863 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lr6l4TRlwTqo for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A621A0356 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.133] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 379441802B9F; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:23:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53D7CA7E.90000@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:23:26 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stbryant@cisco.com, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <53BAA7BA.2060903@pi.nu> <53D775E8.7050902@pi.nu> <53D7C230.3040404@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53D7C230.3040404@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/4wHp9eGdjnm2_WqiwZMfNrrQc-M
Cc: "draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return@tools.ietf.org" <draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Closed: Poll to see if we have support to make draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:23:28 -0000

Ack!

/Loa

On 2014-07-29 17:48, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Loa
>
> I submitted as draft-ietf-mpls-pm-udp-return
>
> See the review comment by Eric
>
> The content is about PM so Eric is correct.
>
> Stewart
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: MPLS-RT review of draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return
> Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:31:41 +0000
> Resent-From: <draft-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org>
> Resent-To: <msiva@cisco.com>, <sagsoni@cisco.com>, <stbryant@cisco.com>,
> <swallow@cisco.com>, <loa@pi.nu>, <rcallon@juniper.net>,
> <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:31:09 +0000
> From: Osborne, Eric <eric.osborne@level3.com>
> To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, "zzhang@juniper.net"
> <zzhang@juniper.net>, "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha"
> <mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org"
> <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN"
> <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>,
> "draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return@tools.ietf.org"
> <draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return@tools.ietf.org>
>
>
> <snip>
>
> Nit: the draft is ‘draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return’ but the doc title
> suggests that ‘draft-bryan-mpls-pm-udp-return’ would make more sense.
>
> <snip>
>
> ==========
>
> On 29/07/2014 11:22, Loa Andersson wrote:
>> Working Group,
>>
>> This adoption poll has been closed; and we have a new working group
>> document.
>>
>> Can the authors please publish draft-ietf-mpls-oam-udp-return-00,
>> without any other changes than the version and date.
>>
>> /Loa
>> for the wg chairs
>>
>> On 2014-07-07 15:59, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>>
>>> The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return has informed us
>>> that the draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus
>>> to make it a working group document.
>>>
>>> This mail starts a two week adoption poll.
>>>
>>> We have not yet done the IPR poll, it will be done in parallel to the
>>> adoption poll.
>>>
>>> There are no IPR disclosed against this draft.
>>>
>>> Please send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list
>>> (mpls@ietf.org)
>>>
>>> This adoption poll ends Juli 21, 2014!
>>>
>>> /Loa
>>> for the mpls wg co-chairs
>>>
>>
>
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64