Re: [mpls] Closed: Poll to see if we have support to make draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return an mpls working group document

Greg,

The new name was recommended during WG adoption
and I am sure I said I would make the change. No one
commented at the time.

I am more than willing to change the draft name again if that
is the consensus. However I would like to do so before making
substantive changes to the text.

I await the instructions of the chairs.

Stewart

On 29/07/2014 17:51, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
> Dear Stewart, et. al,
> I think that Performance Measurement includes a broader set of measurements than Delay and Loss, e.g. Throughput, Available Bandwidth. I think that characterizing RFC 6374 and its extensions as the MPLS PM RFC is not entirely accurate. These documents add to overall solution of the MPLS PM but do not address all its aspects.
>
> 	Regards,
> 		Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 8:48 AM
> To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Adrian Farrel
> Cc: draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] Closed: Poll to see if we have support to make draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return an mpls working group document
>
> Loa
>
> I submitted as draft-ietf-mpls-pm-udp-return
>
> See the review comment by Eric
>
> The content is about PM so Eric is correct.
>
> Stewart
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: MPLS-RT review of draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return
> Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:31:41 +0000
> Resent-From: <draft-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org>
> Resent-To: <msiva@cisco.com>, <sagsoni@cisco.com>, <stbryant@cisco.com>, <swallow@cisco.com>, <loa@pi.nu>, <rcallon@juniper.net>, <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:31:09 +0000
> From: Osborne, Eric <eric.osborne@level3.com>
> To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, "zzhang@juniper.net"
> <zzhang@juniper.net>, "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha"
> <mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org"
> <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN"
> <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>,
> "draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return@tools.ietf.org"
> <draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return@tools.ietf.org>
>
>
> <snip>
>
> Nit: the draft is 'draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return' but the doc title suggests that 'draft-bryan-mpls-pm-udp-return' would make more sense.
>
> <snip>
>
> ==========
>
> On 29/07/2014 11:22, Loa Andersson wrote:
>> Working Group,
>>
>> This adoption poll has been closed; and we have a new working group
>> document.
>>
>> Can the authors please publish draft-ietf-mpls-oam-udp-return-00,
>> without any other changes than the version and date.
>>
>> /Loa
>> for the wg chairs
>>
>> On 2014-07-07 15:59, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>>
>>> The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return has informed us that
>>> the draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus to make
>>> it a working group document.
>>>
>>> This mail starts a two week adoption poll.
>>>
>>> We have not yet done the IPR poll, it will be done in parallel to the
>>> adoption poll.
>>>
>>> There are no IPR disclosed against this draft.
>>>
>>> Please send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list
>>> (mpls@ietf.org)
>>>
>>> This adoption poll ends Juli 21, 2014!
>>>
>>> /Loa
>>> for the mpls wg co-chairs
>>>
>
> --
> For corporate legal information go to:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> .
>

-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html