Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06.txt an MPLS wg document

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Excellent!

Lou



On March 27, 2013 10:23:30 AM Gregory Mirsky <[e-mail]> 
wrote:
> Hi Lou,
> Thank you. I agree with the proposed change.
>
> 	Regards,
> 		Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 
> 7:07 AM
> To: Gregory Mirsky
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make 
> draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06.txt an MPLS wg document
>
> Hi Greg,
> 	Thanks for the comment.  Sorry about the overdue response.
>
> The proposed revised text to address you comment is:
>
>       ... describes the application of linear protection to
>       unidirectional P2MP entities using 1+1 and 1:1 protection
>       architecture. For 1+1, the approach is for the root of the P2MP
>       tree to bridge the user traffic to both the working and
>       protection entities. Each sink/leaf MPLS-TP node selects the
>       traffic from one entity according to some predetermined
>       criteria.
>
>       For 1:1, the source/root MPLS-TP node needs to identify the
>       existence of a fault condition on any of the branches of the
>       network.  Fault notification happens from the node idenifying
>       the fault to the root node and from the leaves to the root via
>       an out of band path...
>
> I think this covers it.  Do you agree?
>
> Lou
>
> On 1/14/2013 7:35 PM, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > support
> > As a note/suggestion.
> >   * I think that the first paragraph of the Section 6 Survivability
> >     might be interpreted as in 1:1 protection extra traffic on
> >     protection path is not allowed. AFAIK, in 1:1 protection traffic not
> >     being sent on protection paths before the defect detected and the
> >     root been informed to shift traffic onto the protection path.
> >          Regards,
> >                 Greg
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail] [_mailto:[e-mail]_] On Behalf Of 
> Loa Andersson
> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:13 PM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Cc: [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]
> > Subject: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make 
> draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06.txt an MPLS wg document
> > Working group,
> > This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> > draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06 as an MPLS working group document.
> > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group 
> mailing list (mpls at ietf.org). Please give an technical motivation for 
> your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should 
> not be adopted as a working group document.
> > This poll ends January 17, 2013.
> > There are no IPR claim against this document.
> > All the active co-authors has stated on the working group mailing list 
> that they are not aware of any other IPR claims than those already disclosed.
> > /Loa
> > (mpls wg co-chair)
> > --
> >  Loa Andersson                         email: [e-mail]
> > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            [e-mail]
> > Ericsson Inc                          phone: [phone]
> >                                               [phone] > 
> _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > _https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls_
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >