Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06.txt an MPLS wg document

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Daniele,
	We're finally getting around to updating this draft.  See below for
responses in-line.

On 1/10/2013 10:58 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
>  Yes/Support
>  
> with some very minor comments/suggestions:
>  
> BR
> Daniele
>  
> 1 .
>    MPLS TE-LSP support is discussed in [RFC4875] and
>    [RFC5332], and PW support is being developed based on
>    [I-D.ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements] and
>    [I-D.ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements].
> I'd say that P2MP MPLS TE-LSP support is discussed...and P2MP PW support....

done!

>  
> 2.
> 
>    MPLS-TP point-to-
>    multipoint connectivity is analogous to that provided by traditional
>    transport technologies such as Optical Transport Network (OTN) point-
>    to-multipoint [ref?] and optical drop-and-continue [ref?], and thus
>    supports the same class of traditional applications.
> 
> Maybe it could be worth listing which this applications are?
> 

Adding "e.g., video distribution." Do you have any other examples you'd
like to see included?

> 3. 
>  
> 
> Per [RFC6373], the definitions of P2MP, [RFC4875], and GMPLS
>    recovery, [RFC4872] and [RFC4873], do not explicitly cover their
>    interactions.  MPLS-TP requires a formal definition of recovery
>    techniques for P2MP LSPs.  Such a formal definition will be based on
>    existing RFCs and may not require any new protocol mechanisms but,
>    nonetheless, should be documented. 
> 
> Is there any plan to document it in this ID o somewhere else? if so, where?

I don't have such a plan, nor have I heard of anyone working on this
document.  Looks like an opportunity for authorship for someone!

> RFC6372 only provides protection considerations, what about restoration?

Well this is really a comment on RFC6372.  In any case, it certainly
mentions restoration.

Much thanks!
Lou

> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Loa Andersson <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
>     Working group,
> 
>     This is to start a two week poll on adopting
>     draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06 as an MPLS working group document.
> 
>     Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>     group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org <http://ietf.org>). Please give
>     an technical
>     motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
>     the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
>     This poll ends January 17, 2013.
> 
>     There are no IPR claim against this document.
> 
>     All the active co-authors has stated on the working group mailing list
>     that they are not aware of any other IPR claims than those already
>     disclosed.
> 
>     /Loa
>     (mpls wg co-chair)
> 
>     -- 
> 
> 
>     Loa Andersson                         email:
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            [e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     Ericsson Inc                          phone: [phone]
>     <tel:%2B46%2010%20717%2052%2013>
>                                                  [phone]
>     <tel:%2B46%20767%2072%2092%2013>
>     _______________________________________________
>     mpls mailing list
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
>      
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>