Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06.txt an MPLS wg document

We will take a look at the points below as part of -01.

- Stewart

On 10/01/2013 17:58, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
> Yes/Support
> with some very minor comments/suggestions:
> BR
> Daniele
> 1 .
> MPLS TE-LSP support is discussed in [RFC4875] and
>    [RFC5332], and PW support is being developed based on
>    [I-D.ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements] and
>    [I-D.ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements].
> I'd say that P2MP MPLS TE-LSP support is discussed...and P2MP PW 
> support....
> 2.
>     MPLS-TP point-to-
>     multipoint connectivity is analogous to that provided by traditional
>     transport technologies such as Optical Transport Network (OTN) point-
>     to-multipoint [ref?] and optical drop-and-continue [ref?], and thus
>     supports the same class of traditional applications.
> Maybe it could be worth listing which this applications are?
> 3.
>   
> Per [RFC6373], the definitions of P2MP, [RFC4875], and GMPLS
>     recovery, [RFC4872] and [RFC4873], do not explicitly cover their
>     interactions.  MPLS-TP requires a formal definition of recovery
>     techniques for P2MP LSPs.  Such a formal definition will be based on
>     existing RFCs and may not require any new protocol mechanisms but,
>     nonetheless, should be documented.
> Is there any plan to document it in this ID o somewhere else? if so, where? RFC6372 only provides protection considerations, what about restoration?
>   
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu  <mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:
>
>     Working group,
>
>     This is to start a two week poll on adopting
>     draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework-06 as an MPLS working group document.
>
>     Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>     group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org <http://ietf.org>). Please
>     give an technical
>     motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
>     the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
>     This poll ends January 17, 2013.
>
>     There are no IPR claim against this document.
>
>     All the active co-authors has stated on the working group mailing list
>     that they are not aware of any other IPR claims than those already
>     disclosed.
>
>     /Loa
>     (mpls wg co-chair)
>
>     -- 
>
>
>     Loa Andersson     email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
>     <mailto:loa.andersson@ericsson.com>
>     Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>
>     Ericsson Inc      phone: +46 10 717 52 13
>     <tel:%2B46%2010%20717%2052%2013>
>     +46 767 72 92 13 <tel:%2B46%20767%2072%2092%2013>
>     _______________________________________________
>     mpls mailing list
>     mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html