RE: [mpls] working group last call fordraft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps

"Attila Takacs" <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com> Tue, 25 September 2007 06:33 UTC

Return-path: <mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia3z3-0003pk-9o; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:33:25 -0400
Received: from mpls by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia3z0-0003jN-OG for mpls-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:33:22 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia3z0-0003dQ-5m for mpls@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:33:22 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia3yz-0004aO-I2 for mpls@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:33:22 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 901912150F; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:33:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-af032bb0000007e1-f1-46f8abb09c35
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.121]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 7882D2142F; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:33:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw116.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.7]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:33:20 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [mpls] working group last call fordraft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:33:19 +0200
Message-ID: <53CCFDD6E346CB43994852666C210E911530F6@esealmw116.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <46F775D1.80608@pi.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls] working group last call fordraft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps
Thread-Index: Acf+h03/z4LiheXmTxmPiwq4oZf+1gAthk/g
References: <46F775D1.80608@pi.se>
From: Attila Takacs <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>, mpls@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2007 06:33:20.0115 (UTC) FILETIME=[F6BF0430:01C7FF3D]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cd26b070c2577ac175cd3a6d878c6248
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi all,

Some comments and questions on the draft. 

Best regards,
Attila


Section 1,
-remove the full stops after the expansion of acronyms

Section 2,
-paragraph 1: remove the explanation "(TE LSP signaled with zero
bandwidth)"

-paragraph 2: the text is unclear on what is referred by "such metrics"
in the last sentence. To clarify remove the parenthesis from "(other
metric...)" and change "other metric..." => "on metrics, e.g.,
percentage of reserved bandwidth or the number of hops." Maybe the last
sentence should simply state something like: "Unfortunately, in the
presence of unconstrained TE LSPs constraints on reserved bandwidth and
number of LSPs may be misleading and may lead to poorly load balanced
traffic."

-paragraph 5 ("Note that...") and 7 ("Furthermore, the...") should be
moved after paragraph 3

-paragraph 6: ("TE LSPs signaled..."): why do you exclude provisioned
LSPs? I can understand that there are cases where the information on
management plane provisioned LSPs is not needed/available, however I
think the proposed extensions should be more general and allow
collecting information on all the unconstrained LSPs in the TED.
Wouldn't it be possible to have two fields to include both the number of
unconstrained signaled and provisioned LSPs in the new TLV?

Section 3,
-maybe a figure would be appropriate showing the new TLV format.

Section 4,
-change ISIS to IS-IS 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.se] 
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 10:31 AM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: Ross Callon; David Ward
> Subject: [mpls] working group last call 
> fordraft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps 
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> this is to initiate a two week working group last call om 
> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-06.txt.
> 
> The working group last call ends eob Oct 8.
> 
> Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
> 
> Loa and George
> 
> --
> Loa Andersson
> 
> Principal Networking Architect
> Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
> Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
> Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
>                                            loa@pi.se
> 
> This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. 
> http://www.astaro.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls